About Me

Name: King Vinyl
Email: Derekstorck@yahoo.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Corrected part 3 Q & A the Immigration???

This is part three of my five part interview with GOP primary candidate for Missouri's 5th US House District race Chris Knowlton.  I made an error and missed publishing a few of his answers and felt it best to republish the entire segment.  This is a vital national issue that effects everyone.  I think anyone who dares run to represent the views of his/her constituents should be asked and should answer each and every one of these questions.
 
I would like to thank Mr. Knowlton for his direct and honest answers to these tough questions.  I would also like to point out that I have invited his opponents to also give us their opinions on this issue.   I sent them a complete copy of the interview below and have yet to hear back from their campaign offices.  If they respond I will post it as I have with Mr Knowlton's and will follow it up with a question by question breakdown on the differences on the issues.
 
 
 

Immigration

1a) Are you in favor of making American English the official language of the United States of America? Yes

English is the common language and our historical tongue and if there has to be a law to establish what is true. I will stand and make it so. The question is how stupid do we have to be to need a law to state the truth? Shakespeare lawyer rant may have been true then but is even truer now.

1b) Is it now time to stop the practice of teaching core curriculum public school classes in foreign languages? Yes

1c) Do you consider Mexican Spanish a foreign language when it is used as a primary means of communication in the US? Yes

2a) Would you be in favor of returning ALL criminals to their home countries who are in the US illegally and criminals with temporary status.

With 35% of our Federal prisons being filled by other than Citizens I would consider the immediate deportation of all criminals. My problem is that I do not trust their countries of origin to make their sentences stick. There would be all kinds of revolving doors and corruption that would put them back on the streets of the U.S. ! In principal I agree they should have never been here in the first place.

I don’t think it is in our countries best interest to allow criminals to benefit from our countries blessings. If they have bad backgrounds in their home country, they should be returned. If they are convicted of wrong doing in the States they should serve their full sentence and be deported without any ability to achieve freedom in our country.

2b) As it concerns the 14th amendment ,children born to illegal aliens. This seems to be a tough issue to because it deals with innocent children. Would you consider reforming laws that more clearly define the exceptions to the 14th amendment to include children born to guest workers, criminals and all those who refuse to get in line for a green card? Or does the 14th amendment already make it clear in Sec. 2 that "other crime" could constitute an exception for all who have violated our immigration laws?

It is a common practice in the law to seize the proceeds of unlawful acts and I can see that working in this situation. If someone was born here of one or more illegals after the 1987 Amnesty, there should be special consequences. What those are I am not quite sure, but if there are no consequences we will never put a stop to this invasion. As United States’ citizens we must allow ourselves the thought of placing a value on our Legal Birth-Right.

2c) Would you be in favor of zero tolerance as it relates to enforcement?

Without question, zero tolerance should be the standard in dealing with Illegal Immigration. If their family arrived after the 1987 Simpson-Mazzolli bill there should be a special court for immediate review with deportation as the goal.

 

3a) A lower end income taxpayer has to perform a trade for less to compete with an illegal worker alien (IWA). Do you believe that denies the poor and middle class workers in America the right to work in a free market economy.

I have seen a lot of good hard working Americans being driven out of one trade or another. Tile, drywall, roofing, concrete and many other trades have been affected by the 20 million illegals that we support. No one will ever know what individuals would have done had this cheap labor not been available. What businesses would still be employing citizens for a good wage? What businessmen would have been created with a more elastic wage base? We are a good and gracious nation. But at sometime even America will say that our laws mean something to us, even if you ignore them.

There is no question that the Millions of low-end Illegal workers depress the market value of many millions of legal citizens. How many entepnures have been forced out of their business plan and middle class future because they can not or will not compete with these Illegally low wages and quality of work? The Courts and the Feds have let the public down over the years in many ways. This blind eye towards the Illegal invasion and occupation, may be the worst case of Treason that our country has ever seen. It must be corrected for our children and grand children.

3b)Do you think the illegal aliens or the those who hire them want that to stop?

There is no indication that I have seen that there is any reason to stop. At this time there is no downside to the fraud and corruption that illegals or their boss must commit. If the goal is to utilize cheap and many times a substandard labor source, that’s where Illegals come in. No one can convince me that they are not aware of the status of those they employee. So they are complicit in the federal crime of identity theft at a minimum and in certain cases much worse criminal activity. If the current laws were enforced the jobs would dry up and many would self-deport.

 

4a) Should the US government provide guest worker programs to companies who feel they have a right to have labor at a specified rate of pay?

No. Setting wages is already handled in the Minimum Wage issue. If they are here the law says they are entitled to a minimum wage. To negotiate as a nation for lower than that would smack of hypocrisy. I can understand that Agri-Business and others would like lower input costs for their bottom-line. But isn’t that how some justify the current open borders philosophy? And there are Guest worker programs on the books. They may need to be streamlined for our current worker needs, but I ask who was doing the jobs before the Illegals? I bet they were Americans!

There are guest worker programs that are currently available. Surprise! It is just too much headache working with the Government and so easy to avoid detection that many go around the law. Thus, the Government is making criminals out of citizens by not enforcing certain laws and choosing to enforce others. What a great system.

 

 

4b) As it relates to guest workers isn’t any measure to make retroactive immigration reform just a scheme of price fixing the labor market?

Could be. But I feel that there may be a more sinister goal for retroactive immigration. There seems to be a party that needs a victim to prey on. This is not just the greedy corporate types, but a political movement that is running out of under-classed, under-educated needy people. Who can be lied to over the next few decades in the hopes of the Federal government giving them everything that they need. (I am not in that party!)

4c) What possible benefit can a guest worker program have on the "poor" and the middle class of this country?

I do not see and upside for the poor and middle class. Perhaps, the cost of certain items would be more affordable. But other than that, I can only see those coming in on guest worker programs, lowering the wages and opportunities for the rest of us.

5a) Should states most affected by illegal human labor smuggling be permitted to sue the federal government and be allowed to enforce current written law?

If a class action suit would get the House and Senate to take action I would apply! Since they are lawyers in most cases that may be the only way to get their attention. Tie up their personal and Electoral assets until the suit is complete. But, we should not leave out the Judges that overstep the constitutional truths that we find self-evident. Those who allow Illegals go away after an initial hearing on their status. Especially when that Illegal causes trouble or does a DWI T-bone into a family of four! That judge should be off the bench!

5b) Does lack of immigration enforcement weaken other law enforcement efforts concerning drugs, gangs, and other crimes of violence?

Duh! How do you think the first time crossing gets paid for? Bicycles loaded with drugs are pushed to the border and left at the staging area just inside our territory. A $20,000 fee per person must be paid some way. And drugs are an easy profitable, high demand product that pay off most of the coyotes who encourage those new comers to keep up the business! Where there are drugs there is cash and guns which can sometimes go off. That could be why there are 35% of the federal prison population filled illegals.

6a) Do you think a worker in a hazardous work zone is in danger or possibly a danger to others around him/her if that person is unable to communicate in English?

Yes.

6b) Wouldn’t a law banning hiring practices by all enterprises that require bilingual or other foreign language background better protect the rights of the American worker?

They can not enforce a ban the importation of stuff that is Illegal. So how can they make a hiring ban work? The best way to get through our current mess is to agree as a nation that we speak English. Learn it or leave. If employers need international language skills as a requirement for job status, I have no problem. So long as it is not McDonalds or Joe’s roofing.

7a) Can we solve the problems of health care and education without addressing the issue of illegal immigration.

No.

 

8a) Do you support a southern border fence as passed by the 109th congress?

Yes and would fully fund this effort and deploy 1,000,000 bureaucrats to monitor the border. This would serve two distinct purposed. First to get them out of Washington and secondly to prevent the Envasion from the south being continued.

Yes! It took less time to build the A-bomb than to build this fence. How far have we slipped?

 

8b) Do you support using legislation to encourage illegal aliens to return to their own countries voluntarily?

In a coercive way! Drying up Identification fraud, duplicate SSN usage, following these duplicate numbers that are registered with the IRS and all of the S.S.N. 000-00-0000 numbers that are used would be a start. But without teeth, the current situation will continue to grow this extractable problem. Our full nation must be of one accord that Citizenship means something and has extrinsic value! Something worth fighting for and standing up for! With out that feeling in our nation we will fall for the emotional stories of the families that are split apart by our mean laws. What about the families that were left behind when the Illegals headed this way? Will the media dig that deeply?

 

8c) Is there ever a time or place you would consider endorsing a $250 billion plan to mass deport all person in the US illegally?

Not likely. Our system will have to work on the employers first, then the sanctuary cities or states and then perhaps the last 10 million will have to be rounded up through charitable agencies if the rest of the social service safety net is removed. That is unless they become more lawless and get caught! Then the courts and the jails will have to deal with them.

8d) What if we were attacked by a terrorist who came over our southern border? Or if the terrorist is an illegal alien?

I would hate to see any further attacks on our country such as 9-11. But the likelihood of the U.S. avoiding future aggression by those who envy or hate us is small! We will be the target of many. Where it comes from will determine the response that the public will demand. I hesitate to predict anything. But I feel that we could get more serious if there was more of a perceived threat. 20 Million Illegals is cause enough for me, how about you?

9) Do you believe current illegal aliens want citizenship or do they just want things to stay the same?

That is an unknown. I believe that most illegals want a better life than what they have had in the past. They find this an easy place to stay and make good lives. This is the story of America. What we need to do is send them home to a better economy in their homeland. I believe that Americans would stand up and adopt to mentor honest hard working illegals, to help them get re-established in their home country. It is worth a shot. I can not see the U.S. with jackboots and guns rounding people up to deport. Yet it may come to that some day.

This is not their home. The major problem is that they can not make a living wage in their land. But they would be glad to be home if they could.

 

Chris Knowlton

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part 3 Q & A Topic the Immigration?

 

Part 3 Q & A Topic the Immigration

Posted by King Vinyl on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:30:04 PM

This is part 3 of 5 of my interview with candidate Chris Knowlton GOP primary candidate for Missouri's 5th district US House seat. The topic is immigration. These are not just questions to ask Chris but also questions to ask any person seeking to represent you as your member of congress.

Thank you Chris for being so generous with your time.

Part 4 tomorrow when we discuss world issues.

Immigration

1a) Are you in favor of making American English the official language of the United States of America? Yes

1b) Is it now time to stop the practice of teaching core curriculum public school classes in foreign languages? Yes

1c) Do you consider Mexican Spanish a foreign language when it is used as a primary means of communication in the US? Yes

2a) Would you be in favor of returning ALL criminals to their home countries who are in the US illegally and criminals with temporary status.

I don’t think it is in our countries best interest to allow criminals to benefit from our countries blessings. If they have bad backgrounds in their home country, they should be returned. If they are convicted of wrong doing in the States they should serve their full sentence and be deported without any ability to achieve freedom in our country.

2b) As it concerns the 14th amendment ,children born to illegal aliens. This seems to be a tough issue to because it deals with innocent children. Would you consider reforming laws that more clearly define the exceptions to the 14th amendment to include children born to guest workers, criminals and all those who refuse to get in line for a green card? Or does the 14th amendment already make it clear in Sec. 2 that "other crime" could constitute an exception for all who have violated our immigration laws?

2c) Would you be in favor of zero tolerance as it relates to enforcement?

Without question, zero tolerance should be the standard in dealing with Illegal Immigration. If their family arrived after the 1987 Simpson-Mazzolli bill there should be a special court for immediate review with deportation as the goal.

3a) A lower end income taxpayer has to perform a trade for less to compete with an illegal worker alien (IWA). Do you believe that denies the poor and middle class workers in America the right to work in a free market economy.

There is no question that the Millions of low-end Illegal workers depress the market value of many millions of legal citizens. How many untenured have been forced out of their business plan and middle class future because they can not or will not compete with these Illegally low wages and quality of work? The Courts and the Feds have let the public down over the years in many ways. This blind eye towards the Illegal invasion and occupation, may be the worst case of Treason that our country has ever seen. It must be corrected for our children and grand children.

3b)Do you think the illegal aliens or the those who hire them want that to stop?

There is no indication that I have seen that there is any reason to stop. At this time there is no downside to the fraud and corruption that illegals or their boss must commit. If the goal is to utilize cheap and many times a substandard labor source, that’s where Illegals come in. No one can convince me that they are not aware of the status of those they employee. So they are complicit in the federal crime of identity theft at a minimum and in certain cases much worse criminal activity. If the current laws were enforced the jobs would dry up and many would self-deport.

4a) Should the US government provide guest worker programs to companies who feel they have a right to have labor at a specified rate of pay?

No. Setting wages is already handled in the Minimum Wage issue. If they are here the law says they are entitled to a minimum wage. To negotiate as a nation for lower than that would smack of hypocrisy. I can understand that Agra-Business and others would like lower input costs for their bottom-line. But isn’t that how some justify the current open borders philosophy? And there are Guest worker programs on the books. They may need to be streamlined for our current worker needs, but I ask who was doing the jobs before the Illegals? I bet they were Americans!

4b) As it relates to guest workers isn’t any measure to make retroactive immigration reform just a scheme of price fixing the labor market?

Could be. But I feel that there may be a more sinister goal for retroactive immigration. There seems to be a party that needs a victim to prey on. This is not just the greedy corporate types, but a political movement that is running out of under-classed, under-educated needy people. Who can be lied to over the next few decades in the hopes of the Federal government giving them everything that they need. (I am not in that party!)

4c) What possible benefit can a guest worker program have on the "poor" and the middle class of this country?

I do not see and upside for the poor and middle class. Perhaps, the cost of certain items would be more affordable. But other than that, I can only see those coming in on guest worker programs, lowering the wages and opportunities for the rest of us.

5a) Should states most affected by illegal human labor smuggling be permitted to sue the federal government and be allowed to enforce current written law?

If a class action suit would get the House and Senate to take action I would apply! Since they are lawyers in most cases that may be the only way to get their attention. Tie up their personal and Electoral assets until the suit is complete. But, we should not leave out the Judges that overstep the constitutional truths that we find self-evident. Those who allow Illegals go away after an initial hearing on their status. Especially when that Illegal causes trouble or does a DWI T-bone into a family of four! That judge should be off the bench!

5b) Does lack of immigration enforcement weaken other law enforcement efforts concerning drugs, gangs, and other crimes of violence?

Duh! How do you think the first time crossing gets paid for? Bicycles loaded with drugs are pushed to the border and left at the staging area just inside our territory. A $20,000 fee per person must be paid some way. And drugs are an easy profitable, high demand product that pay off most of the coyotes who encourage those new comers to keep up the business! Where there are drugs there is cash and guns which can sometimes go off. That could be why there are 35% of the federal prison population filled illegals.

6a) Do you think a worker in a hazardous work zone is in danger or possibly a danger to others around him/her if that person is unable to communicate in English?

Yes.

6b) Wouldn’t a law banning hiring practices by all enterprises that require bilingual or other foreign language background better protect the rights of the American worker?

They can not enforce a ban the importation of stuff that is Illegal. So how can they make a hiring ban work? The best way to get through our current mess is to agree as a nation that we speak English. Learn it or leave. If employers need international language skills as a requirement for job status, I have no problem. So long as it is not McDonalds or Joe’s roofing.

7a) Can we solve the problems of health care and education without addressing the issue of illegal immigration.

No.

8a) Do you support a southern border fence as passed by the 109th congress?

Yes and would fully fund this effort and deploy 1,000,000 bureaucrats to monitor the border. This would serve two distinct purposed. First to get them out of Washington and secondly to prevent the Invasion from the south being continued.

8b) Do you support using legislation to encourage illegal aliens to return to their own countries voluntarily?

In a coercive way! Drying up Identification fraud, duplicate SSN usage, following these duplicate numbers that are registered with the IRS and all of the 000-00-0000 numbers that are used would be a start. But without teeth, the current situation will continue to grow this extractable problem. Our full nation must be of one accord that Citizenship means something and has extrinsic value! Something worth fighting for and standing up for! With out that feeling in our nation we will fall for the emotional stories of the families that are split apart by our mean laws. What about the families that were left behind when the Illegals headed this way? Will the media dig that deeply?

8c) Is there ever a time or place you would consider endorsing a $250 billion plan to mass deport all person in the US illegally?

Not likely. Our system will have to work on the employers first, then the sanctuary cities or states and then perhaps the last 10 million will have to be rounded up through charitable agencies if the rest of the social service safety net is removed. That is unless they become more lawless and get caught! Then the courts and the jails will have to deal with them.

8d) What if we were attacked by a terrorist who came over our southern border? Or if the terrorist is an illegal alien?

I would hate to see any further attacks on our country such as 9-11. But the likelihood of the U.S. avoiding future aggression by those who envy or hate us is small! We will be the target of many. Where it comes from will determine the response that the public will demand. I hesitate to predict anything. But I feel that we could get more serious if there was more of a perceived threat. 20 Million Illegals is cause enough for me, how about you?

9) Do you believe current illegal aliens want citizenship or do they just want things to stay the same?

This is not their home. The major problem is that they can not make a living wage in their land. But they would be glad to be home if they could.

Chris Knowlton

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sherriff Joe for VEEP!!! an open letter to Anne Coulter

This has been one of the strangest years.  I never would have thought I would be a critic of Anne Coulter.  A woman whose physical beauty is only surpassed by her sexy intellect.  But I must have missed it, what has Mitt Romney done Anne?  Its' not the LDS thing hun thats' just the puff piece.  Name one damn thing he has done in the name of conservatism.  It is like asking a liberal about Obama's record of "change".  Don't go economic on me because Fred Flintstone could have gotten those numbers in those economic times.  I don't care about Olympics or private enterprise either.  Well except for the idea that he goes into big companies gets rid of decent paying jobs by buying out  employees on early retirement.  Those persons are usually replaced with illegals from a temp agency.  As Gov. of Massachusetts what did he promote?  Gay marriage, abortion,  government healthcare, and amnesty.  Woohoo!!!
 
I settled for Huckabee here in the Missouri Primary.  Guilani knew he was being stood up he knew it he is too New Yorkey.  Romney is a "Paper Tiger Conservative" testing the wind with his wet finger before he speaks.  Thompson is a great speach writer. Now McCain we agree on 110 million%.  But Huck was no worse than Bush he might need a Cheney but at least he speeks ENGLISH!!!  When you and your croneys say he is worse than McCain you are totally dishonest about the facts.  Bottom line is we are where we are for lack of a better road.  Hillary is not our girl I don't even think she is female. 
 
McCain is going to be president IF a Republican is elected this fall and neither Huckabee nor Romney can balance that ticket.  As it stands I won't be voting for him, he lost me at the gaggle of 14 for the last time.  If however he were tap Joe Arpaio you know the Maricopa County Sherriff from AZ as his VP.  Every conservative would be foaming at the mouth this November.
 
Joe is an honorable man with conservative heart and a John Wanye style of GOP justice.  You talk about what would Reagan do well this is it.  Reagan would have been all over this idea if he were with us today.  I can still hear him speaking his thoughts so etched in my mind.  His thoughts were unnique like Joe Arpaios' he was a man on great vision like Sheriff Joe.
 
We need a hero that is why Guilani was thought of until his political leanings surfaced.  Now I know we try to cover the map regionally when we think VP.  But McCain has the Reagan Democrats sewn up.  Hunter and Tancredo fit the bill but Joe Arpaio is well known as a huge problem solver.  Love him or hate him the results speak for themselves. 
 
Sherriff Joe for VEEP!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Juan Vito McCainleon will he blow it with VEEP selection

So who will it be?  Some of us are on the edge of our seats waiting to see if McCain will push the envelope and pick a running mate who will garner him some conservative support.  Oh wait he might just think Obama has ensured him the conservatives so it doesn't matter who he picks.  He could then pick anyone from Hillary Clinton to Mitt Romney in either case he will loose what he may not beleive can be lost.
Honestly I would probably still cast a vote against Obama if he picked Hillary, because there is no way she could win a GOP primary.  However I will vote for Barrack if he chooses Mitt, because he will continue to distort the line on conservatism.
 
McCain would do well to pick a candidate who is a real conservative.  I would like to suggest he choose one because he is on thin ice with the base of his party.  A failed Obama administration is a far better road to go down than a McCain administration that moves conservatism out of the GOP.
 
Reagan took a few issues that the public overwhelmingly wanted addressed and he showed what conservatism can provide in the way of resolution to those issues.  His successes are the reason he won in a landslide when he sought re-election in 84'.  Bush Sr. failed to hold the line on conservatism when he coat tailed the success of Reagan that cost him against Clinton in 92'.  Most would say it was the Perot factor, that is simply not true.  Perot would have never been on the map in 84' against Reagan.  Then we have W. Bush who has looked more like Reagan than his father.  He won in 04' because he held the line his popularity faded when he allowed liberalism to set the agenda.  Still I as well as many other conservatives would rather vote him to a third term over the current crop despite the polls.
 
McCain threatens to take the party back to the dark days.
 
Please John give us a real conservative reason to vote against Obama. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can your candidate answer these Immigration questions

Immigration

1a) Are you in favor of making American English the official language of the United States of America?

1b) Is it now time to stop the practice of teaching core curriculum public school classes in foreign languages?

1c) Do you consider Mexican Spanish a foreign language when it is used as a primary means of communication in the US?

2a) Would you be in favor of returning ALL criminals to their home countries who are in the US illegally and criminals with temporary status.

2b) As it concerns the 14th amendment ,children born to illegal aliens. This seems to be a tough issue to because it deals with innocent children. Would you consider reforming laws that more clearly define the exceptions to the 14th amendment to include children born to guest workers, criminals and all those who refuse to get in line for a green card? Or does the 14th amendment already make it clear in Sec. 2 that “other crime” could constitute an exception for all who have violated our immigration laws?

2c) Would you be in favor of zero tolerance as it relates to enforcement?

 

3a) A lower end income taxpayer has to perform a trade for less to compete with an illegal worker alien (IWA). Do you believe that denies the poor and middle class workers in America the right to work in a free market economy.

3b)Do you think the illegal aliens or those who hire them want that to stop?

 

4a) Should the US government provide guest worker programs to companies who feel they have a right to have labor at a specified rate of pay?

4b) As it relates to guest workers isn’t any measure to make retroactive immigration reform just a scheme of price fixing the labor market?

4c) What possible benefit can a guest worker program have on the “poor” and the middle class of this country?

5a) Should states most affected by illegal human labor smuggling be permitted to sue the federal government and be allowed to enforce current written law?

5b) Does lack of immigration enforcement weaken other law enforcement efforts concerning drugs, gangs, and other crimes of violence?

6a) Do you think a worker in a hazardous work zone is in danger or possibly a danger to others around him/her if that person is unable to communicate in English?

6b) Wouldn’t a law banning hiring practices by all enterprises that require bilingual or other foreign language backround better protect the rights of the American worker?

7a) Can we solve the problems of health care and education without addressing the issue of illegal immigration.

 

8a) Do you support a southern border fence as passed by the 109th congress?

8b) Do you support using legislation to encourage illegal aliens to return to their own countries voluntarily?

8c) Is there ever a time or place you would consider endorsing a $250 billion plan to mass deport all person in the US illegally?

8d) What if we were attacked by a terrorist who came over our southern border? Or if the terrorist is an illegal alien?

 

9) Do you believe current illegal aliens want citizenship or do they just want things to stay the same?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part 2 Q & A Topic the Economy

Chris Knowlton gave me this no holds barred interview!!!

So I asked him question on these five major topics of intense political discussion. They are education, the economy, immigration, National , And finally World issues. But really shouldn't every politician be running to the microphone to assert their position on either side?

Well don't hold your breath, find out!!!

Mr. Knowlton is a man who is running for congress in the Missouri 5th District House Primary race. This is the second segment of 5 questions these address the topic of the Economy.

Economy

 
 Bootheel Buzz:
1) Is it fair to say that a direct link can be made between the high cost of fuel and the weakening dollar in the overall US economy?
 
Chris Knowlton:

In some ways. Trade in general led by Oil has placed this drain on American wealth, with Trillions of dollars leaving our pockets for countries that have no love or allegiance to our way of life. China, Saudi Arabia and others have different goals than our nation does and with the accumulation of wealth, which we provide to them, Dictators do what they generally do. They manipulate things to their favor.

Bootheel Buzz:
 
2) Do support legislation to end all earmark spending?
Chris Knowlton:

Yes. While earmarks would be a very powerful tool for the minority who may not be able to have their appropriations considered while not in power. I feel that it is a breech of trust. The legislators are to play within the system and not go around it. This sends a bad message to the country, that they are above the law and are willing to skirt their own policy’s to get what they want, which is usually expressed with money from the general fund or tax policy’s that exempt their favorite benefactors. So, I would do my best to end earmarks.


Bootheel Buzz:
 
3) Would you support Fair Tax style legislation, that taxes you based on what you spend?
Chris Knowlton:
 

Yes. My plan is slightly different than the book lays out. I would tax citizens 5% and non-citizens 10% (and imports) from their checking accounts. Citizens would buy back American debt with 4of the 5% with the remainder going to the Federal budget. Companies would also send 1% to the Feds while splitting the 4% equally with their employees. Our non-citizen 10% would go directly to a fund for the states. Those funds would be equally divided by the number of Representatives and Senators for each state. That caucus would present a spending plan to their respective state legislature for agreement prior to disbursement.

This plan would eliminate all federal taxes, the IRS and reduce the size of the Federal Government so that it might live within its means. It would also place the debt of this nation in the hands of interested parties, its citizens.

 
Bootheel Buzz:
4) In the 80’s we had “Where’s the Beef” when it came to a good hamburger. When it comes to climate change can we at least ask. What happened to the next ice age, nuclear destruction, acid rain, the ozone layer and now, “where is this globe a warming”?
Chris Knowlton:
 

You are correct. There are some productive things that have come out of the Manmade Global Warming issue. It has shown how poorly our schools have done in critical thinking and history. It has exposed those who would control everything in our lives to be tyrants in "De-sky’s" and it has shown how emotional issues can glaze the eyes of normally intelligent people. I trust that the Europeans and Canadians that signed on to Kyoto and have failed to meet their 2007 Carbon levels may be learning their lesson. Restriction policy’s truly hurt real people and Carbon only helps plants.


Bootheel Buzz:

5) The Democrats often point to the futures market as the main cause of record high crude oil prices. Is this an oil price bubble and would these prices increase or decrease with an increase US oil exploration?

 Chris Knowlton:

This is a supply vs demand question. The Southeast Asians and the Pacific Rim countries are growing rapidly with our exported cash. They like to use the U.S. as a model of what they can offer their population. They want better food, a nice place to stay and better stuff. And then they want freedom of movement, which is where cars and fuel to move them come in. We have it they want it and with this newfound prosperity they will not be denied. Oil is a big part of their success as it has been with our success. It currently drives this economy. If we kept some of our money here and some of our oil jobs here we would be in better shape in many areas. Drill here, drill now and pay less.

 
Bootheel Buzz:
 
6) Is there any chance we can conserve our way to energy independence without huge new advances in technology?
 
Chris Knowlton:
 

No. Those who believe that conservation alone are hopeless and have little understanding of markets. Being a good steward of what we have been blessed with could be emphasized more. One must put something in to get something out. If there is nothing to put in there will be no resulting output. This may be what some want. I assure you that I will fight this to the bitter end. And with my 60 year plan will have totally green power production a reality. But we are not there yet.

This concludes the economic portion of our interview catch the next part Immigration as we ask Chris all the hard questions any congressman will have to answer as a member of the US House of Representatives.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US House can stop Amnesty

7/20/08

 

To those on the fence about congress,

What does your next congressman say about illegal immagration?  We can not fix our economy, healthcare, social security, gas prices or any other major issue unless we enoforce the law on citizenship in our country.   
Why not amnesty for everybody?

For every crime ever committed anywhere in these United States. Open every prison, let all the child rapists, drug dealers and murders out. If we just give them a chance, right? The world looks down on us anyway, we have one if not the highest population rates of prisoners anywhere. Then all drug and alcohol rehab clinics, reinstate drivers licenses, forgive all debt and call for peace. They know what they did is wrong and won’t possibly make the same mistake twice if we just change, if we just give hope a chance.

Representatives to our legislature will they make the same mistakes? Will your US Senators, or member to the US House of Representatives continue to give you that blank stare when it comes to the 6-10%. The people who came to our country and are here illegally.

What do 25+ million illegal aliens do that exempts them from our legal system? How can amnesty fix the 10% that comprise 35% of our prison system? Will we discuss this again in another 20 years? This time will the estimate be 200 million illegal, 75% of our prison population?

A lower end income taxpayer has to perform a trade for less to compete with an illegal worker alien (IWA). That denies the poor and middle class worker the right to work in a free market economy. Do you think the illegal aliens or the those who hire them want that to stop? Those who say we need guest worker programs are addicted to slave labor? We have a simple problem in this country and that is a free market understanding. The same politicians who are pushing the free trade all over the world, are the same ones who want to restrict it right here in America. Huge manufacturing companies are in-sourcing IWA as a means of cost control. These short term cuts are a time-bomb that will end all US manufacturing done by US citizens.

The US House of Representatives is a seat we see every 2 years. The true power of the House resides in the tenure of that member. He/she must continue however to do that in a way that represents the views of the party and a majority of all the voting/non-voting constituents. The persuasion of fact versus popular opinion/deception is powerful especially on a complex issue such as citizenship. It takes courage to stand up to the mob rule that seeks to distort the illegal immigration debate. By sending people to the House who oppose allowing amnesty we have a say in the process. However there are many among us who would say there are just jobs Americans don’t want to do. That statement is a lie, Americans have done the jobs other nations can’t or won’t do. Americans won’t enter into a slave labor market which is what skilled and unskilled labor is fast becoming in this country. The farmer has to pay a picker $20/hr to get his crop out of the field if that is what a it takes to get good help. That farmer doesn’t have the right to enslave a Mexican citizen into poverty.

Every civil society has laws, how these laws are applied is just as important as the reason for having them in place. America’s population consists of people from every known race. Where else in the history of the world has one nation gone to war for the interests of another? To the sacrifice of a million or more of its own people, all those many more injured, and not to mention baring the expense. America then returns these lands to people who have long cried out to America for freedom. Our founders have passed these awesome responsibilities to us. A torch of freedom has been entrusted to us, their dream of a world of individual liberty and responsibility. Never should we seek approval of nations who treat their people like battered women. A true humanitarian is almost always an American. Being one who is true to that tradition I says, “let us free Mexico, not fall to their level.” The fact is America sets the standard in everything we do. Some nations see the prosperous effects of individuals having the power of freedom, they are our allies. Political powers in any nation of any stripe see this as a threat to the power they have over their citizens.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part 1 Q & A Topic Education

Chris Knowlton gave me this no holds barred interview!!!

So I asked him question on these five major topics of intense political discussion. They are education, the economy, immigration, National , And finally World issues. But really shouldn't every politician be running to the microphone to assert their position on either side?

Well don't hold your breath, find out!!!

Mr. Knowlton is a man who is running for congress in the Missouri 5th District House Primary race. This is the first segment of 5 questions these address the topic of Education.

Education

Bootheel Buzz question (1):

As a businessman you know the value of a satisfied customer.

Would you support a tax break or a voucher system to give the right of choice to parents whose children

are in failing public schools to pay for their cost of a private education ?

Chris Knowlton answer (1):

America is ask to look toward new and unproven resources for Energy and by the same people we are forced to try new and innovative methods of schooling our best asset, our children. The evolutionists say that things must be allowed to evolve, yet they hold tight the accreditation and funds for home schooling and vouchers. The first to point out the inconsistency gets their choice of seats in the classroom.

Bootheel Buzz question (2):

Would you be in favor of higher quality education at a lower price if it meant privatizing all K through 12 education services?

Chris Knowlton answer (2):

In theory, yes. Far too long Americans have passed bond issues and fully supported the local school districts as we were ask. In many areas the education of our children and future is more than adequate. Still the option of going private or religious should not be legislated against, just to hold the existing system to its low standards.

Bootheel Buzz question (3):

Would you vote for a bill that restricted educational services to those who are legal citizens?

Chris Knowlton answer (3):

Sadly yes. We are a nation of loving, giving people and we open our arms to immigrants. At some point the wheels fall off. Prior to that happening to the children of our legal immigrants and citizens, I would ask for action to be taken against these lawbreakers.

Bootheel Buzz question (4):

Would you be in favor of all core curriculum classes being taught only in American English?

Chris Knowlton answer (4):

Without question. With English being the language of business, we do an injustice to those we allow to fall behind in this department.

Bootheel Buzz question (5):

The numbers don’t lie since to 60s‘ the decline in overall inner city public education is undeniable.

Would you support a removal of the US Department of Education and transferring that power back to the States?

Chris Knowlton answer (5):

My last few answers lean that way. I want to eliminate the duplicity of government. The layers of endless paperwork for job security and control. I bet that if we reduce the controls in education and other areas we will achieve better results. That is the American experiment and experience. But these are touchy feely subjects that sway many votes and the hearts of many.

 

This is the first of six parts of an interview with Congressional Candidate Chris Knowlton of Missouri's 5th US House District in the GOP primary race.

So call your congressional rep or your senator and compare his/her answers and then your own you might be surprised at the results.

Contact info for GOP primary candidate:

Chris Knowlton's Campaign MO 5th

P.O. Box 266383
K.C., Mo. 64126 info@PrimaryChris4KC.org

Tags: interview  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The PaperTiger Conservative

Paper Tiger Conservative

What is a Paper Tiger Conservative?

A Paper Tiger Conservative is someone who is not a conservative. 

The term is used to describe an action that attempts to disguise their own liberal shortcomings with conservative talking points.  By not upholding the principles of small government, individual liberties, and strong national defense.  This individual is also liable to switch positions frequently on the same issue. A key element uses a projecting of their own behaviors on those around them to confuse the issue.  They seek the status of equal and the benefits of a victim. They are both the ying and sudo-yang of our party.  They call for balance from the outside and cause destruction from within.  While they oppose the party platform they seek praise from the opposition.  They call this a compromise, they call it bi-partisanship.  The blood letting Tiger seeks to ensnare the ignorant and weaker in propaganda, emotion and inuendo.  Its' recluse instincts allowing it to veil it's failures by seizing a moment to change the subject.  This person would make a grade A democrat except the one thing they lack is positive popularity.  They are really the misfit liberal whose life is devoted to the quest of being accepted by those it looks up to the left.

AKA: JOHN SYDNEY MCCAIN
Every Democrat who won against a Republican incumbant in 06' did the same thing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PanicRats, Party Turmoil and What's Next????

Is it really true that someone let Bush out?   For a lame duck W. is making people wish they could vote for him in a third term.  While McCain continues his assertion that he is the only candidate whose lack of manhood allows him to straddle the fence.  Obama is floundering in his parties innablility to close the deal.  The energy crisis they created and their failed war policy has given President Bush new life in the last 6 months in office.  The trickle down of these failed poilcies for the environmentally ill will result in the ousting of the freshmen democrats elected in 06' to the house who ran as conservatives.  It doesn't matter how they voted on a bill a mandate to ..."throw the bums out" is at hand!  Global warming is precisly the hoax that caused the prices of food to sky rocket, the democrats solve it by increasing food stamps in the Farm Bill.  This hoax causes gas to double they act as if supply and demand is an illusion.  They promise to change the trend if elected to the majority in congress, they get it, and the price doubles again.  They state we can't cause a change by increasing supply, insisting that demand is the problem and we must lower ours to cause the world prices to go down.  Read that again, we can't change the price by drilling yet we can by lowering our demand, people who believe this think about inhaling oxygen before they take a breath.
 
If our economy is going to go to heck who is going to pay for everybodies healthcare?   If we are loosing the war where are all the news reports?
 
Will they let Osama out on bond if captured?  If he gets aquitted on a technicallity should he be given citizenship if he refuses to leave?  Will American soldiers, and victims families from 911 actually have to take the stand and relive this to convince you he ordered these attacks?
 
Will we ever get GOP candidates with real conservative stones???
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mcnuclear campaign issue ILLEGAL immagration

This man is a fool. We are talking about illegal aliens JOHN!!! Not legal aliens or American citizen, quit being such a bigot Mcshame on you all Hispanics are not illegal aliens. Not all(most) illegal aliens are in fact Mexicans. Not to be confused with AMERICANS. Most in this who party believe in a free market economy. Others claim to unless they can get a Mexican to do it cheaper. They are the raicst, the bigots and we are the Just ones.  Our civilization relies foundation of individual liberty, part of which is the creation of laws that protect the people and establish order.  When laws are written, passed and signed by the representatives of the People of these Untied States and are not enforced the trust in that foundation begins to errode.  We cannot afford another Amnesty Bill.  Americans will do any job, any time, and  any where no matter what we hear on the news.  If the free market determines a landscaper is worth $25/hour Americans will be there.  The free market value of an attorney is between $200-$1000 and up.  Some of the RINOs in our party seem to have the idea that a man can support himself forget about his family on $15/hr. Wrong do the math.  The idea that Mexican slaves are needed to prop up our skilled and unskilled labor operations is nonsense.  So I am really sick and tired of hearing the talkradio parots crow about the tax rates the upper 10% pay.  Most who hold these ignorant opinions can't see past the fog.  The fact that when you artifically restict free trade within private sector of America you are infact leveling taxes on skilled and unskilled labor.  Not all Americans fall into this victim need a desk job crap.  Some choose that because they are good at what they do, I imagine they cut their own grass because they like driving the mower too.  Someone needs to do the job Rush Limbaugh doesn't care to do.  A $15/hr job was good money in the 70s' but many skilled labor postitions paid twice that back then.  Just remember if you own any stock in a major US manufacturing company odds are your dividends rely on the Mexcian slave force.  The market has created the poverty we pay fore in taxes.  The solution is a flat tax and concentrated law enforcement on the Mexican slave trade network opperating inside the US.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi needs to stay in her coffin// the environmentel bubble is about to POP!!!

What is the strangest thing about this election cycle is that the GOP appears as if it may be keeping the powder dry.  This is an oil thing Barrack we do understand why gas is $5, and yes you are dancing in the streets about it.  As for the future former speaker Grandma Plasticosi this sham is about to crap out.  If Bela Lugosi could see you now he would be proud, she carries on scaring the crap out of people in his image. 
The real crux here is whether or not we should just keep our mouthes shut and let their convention tear their party apart or try to influence the debate.  I say, mum is the word here.  We still have more than 3 month to watch this play out.  If we don't let the the dum-masses figure this out themselves the sheeple in our party may cross the isle.
   We all know the sheeple our nominee is one of them.  But like his flock-mates he to sways to the winds of change.  He to will conciede public opinion no matter how concieded he has presented himself as in the past.  McCain is a true blue "wet fingered" politician, his mission "glory" in the eyes of as many Americans and Non-Americans, to be all things to all people.  The biggest difference between him and B.O. is that Barrack is bought and paid for.  McCain is to but by his lust for popularity, in the spotlight of the oval office he can't hide behind the other 99 chairs in the room.  He will have to care about our opinions or we could make him an instant "lame duck", but that would take a bit of courage.  Something our elected leaders lack.  So don't stop the drum beat just keep a consistant rythm the pace will become maddening to them as they look for away out of the lambrinth their ignorance has created.  Amplifying this retoric to soon will only serve to rescue them from this reckless policy of evironmental equality which has trumped logic, sanity, and the human condition.  We are the so called party of the "rich", they champion spending bills in the name of the "poor".   If we attack this in the right way starting on the last day of their convention this could drive a wedge through the core group of voters sought by the democrats this election cycle.  But we have got to back off and allow them to cause their own party caos until they are at their weakest point.  When the bublle burst the best October suprise ever could be a State Department investigation into Algore and all the "carbon credit" type businesses whose activity is thought to have cause a 300% increase in price of oil in the last 9 years.  Squarely place the tail on the donkey, and watch the political machine move to the right, house, senate and yes even John "boy" Sydney McCain.  Great times could be awaiting with solid majority pickups in 08' and 10'.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Trophy Wife

Now I'm your normal adverage middle 30 something kinda a guy I know the difference between trickle down economics and starvation poverty.  You do to, its' good versus evil, so when I look at these two would be first ladies.  Both very attractive women, who seem to have an intelligent grip on the english language I wonder how it is the gloves have not come off?  Neither gal has a single other notable trait in common.  The fact that I see McCain as rigid, calculated, possibly left of the party platform ruins him as a "real" man of vision.  He needs a human element, which he can onl get one of two ways.  The first is to appoligize and admitt he was wrong all those times he sat left of the isle.  The other is to showcase Cindy his wife to woo the public masses with her charismatic charm (or make her that way and repeat step 2).  Because one way or another, don't let the cheerleaders fool you they root harder for a loosing team, McCain has no GOP love and if he can't get it then his wife will have to pick up the slack.  Unless camp Obama allows Michelle to tell us how she really feels, then McCain might beat Nader but let us not take the chance.  Plus it would lighten the mood if John talks about his lovely wife instead of political bipartisianship on the MsMedia.

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Campaign Finance Laws and B.O.

Campaign finance laws

Do they exist in the case of B.O. Is it ethnic or is it a failure to recognize the origin of his campaign. All to often we look to DC as the pit of political demise, and it is. What we have forgotten however is that, "if the Mayor is black he can smoke crack" and that they want to make it illegal to defed yourself. The other thing we foget about is Chicago, doesn't a candidate who from the land of political deserve scrutiny? The man has done everything to embrace.......the local community in Chicago, he goes to the biggest "black church" for 20 years only to leave after his pastor(friend) Jeremiah Wright forced to retire.  He has accociated himself with Oprah to help launch his political movement agaist the lefts N.A.G.als.  The closet company he keeps but denies knowledge of their conduct has to go well beyond his  relations with ACORN, Ayers, Wright, Phlager, even Mrs Obama tells alot about who Barrack Huesien Obama really trully is.  Look at  Dennis Kuk-sin-itch he met his wife at a table dance.  Barry he met the Mrs at a protest ralley.  Her true feelings matter because be definition a marriage is a union, they are teammates for the same cause, their family unit.  What she says, he does if you are married you know if you are not you either no better or haven't been told the right way yet.  Chicago and politics is like pitbulls at the daycare it don't work.  You wouldn't casually drop off your kid at a house with a new pitbull nextdoor.  Chicago has a long reputation for fraud, coruption and huge ammounts of racism.  If you can't spell the word racism by the end of Kindergarten you can vote!!!  Where is Obama getting all of these 10s' of milliions of dollars? Why is he really not going with a publically financed campaign?  Who are the real donors to the campaign?  Will it be tolate before we ask, why is the MSMedia protecting him from any unscripted critism?

 

This entire cycle has been a complete Obamanation




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Bin Lying Extended comment

Has anyone noticed that Obama has become the "Black Candidate" for president?  He really reminds me of Clinton when you get down to it.  Axelrod tells him what to say and when he doesn't he suffers a case of "foot in mouth".  This man is a bigger phony than McCain which is the only reason I am starting to lean toward the McGOP.  I will never vote, campaign, contribute or otherwise support McCain.  He can run on his service record all he wants, I don't care.  His service to this country as an Airman is not an issue in my mind.  What is is his constant ability to pick up and go over to left at the drop of a poll.  His conduct as a member of the Senate is dispicable.  That said, Obama is the recreation of every dictator who has ever charmed his way into power.  He comes with many who seek the absolute destruction of the "American Dream".  The speeches he gives and the color of his skin are his whole platform.  There are those who are tired of the belly aching for a "black president", they would cast a vote for anyone to kill the arguement.  Black Americans most of whom will cast a hipocritical vote for him without regret for their own racist choices.  The same holds true for those who only see color who will not for for him.  The content of Obama is so wrought with anti-Americanism it begs this writer as to what threshold if any exist for black Americans.  To throw their vote and this country into the abiss of communism and inevitable anarchy.  Like I said previously I will not pull the lever for John Sydney McCain distingushed POW, American war hero and dispicable Senator.  However may God save of from this curse of an Obamanation.  In doing so I may have to come home from the voting booth shave every bit of hair from my body, shower in bleach, and go on a liquid diet for the 73 days between election day and inarguration day.  But I will be damned if I let myself cast a vote for anyone other than who can defeat Obama.  If that is McShamnasty I only hope he doesn't vaporize the GOP in the eyes of those to ignorant to become informed among us.
 
One thing I would encourage the conservative faithful as well as the easily lead to the isle if there (is) was a third pary candidate (not Barr) but an actual kick dass taking no prisoners conservative rock with a hint of a snowballs chance of beating out McCain for second I would expect true conservative McGOPers to drop Mcshamnesty like a Led Zep if not I'll take my bleach and vote for McMoped but don't expect me or any other real conservative to kiss and tell.
 
Party loyalty is what keeps us at arm length from him and to say we have no choice but McGOP is at best a hypocracy.  If McCain really wants my vote he needs to appolgize and explain his previous actions that were a 180 from his "parties" offical postitions and the fact that he stood with the other side making false accusation, insinuations, and reading from the script penned by the Democrat left.  I have only one true hope if he is however elected that is what he did through the Bush term he did out of spite and that he will turn it back on the left.  If he serves consistant to his campaign message we will need 10 million men dressed in American Indian garb and 100 trash trucks packed with Tea and a re-enaction of the "Boston Tea Party" to get a real conservative of the bench.
 
But that pakes party loyalty to you know?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive