About Me

Name: King Vinyl
Email: Derekstorck@yahoo.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Juan Vito McCainleon will he blow it with VEEP selection

So who will it be?  Some of us are on the edge of our seats waiting to see if McCain will push the envelope and pick a running mate who will garner him some conservative support.  Oh wait he might just think Obama has ensured him the conservatives so it doesn't matter who he picks.  He could then pick anyone from Hillary Clinton to Mitt Romney in either case he will loose what he may not beleive can be lost.
Honestly I would probably still cast a vote against Obama if he picked Hillary, because there is no way she could win a GOP primary.  However I will vote for Barrack if he chooses Mitt, because he will continue to distort the line on conservatism.
 
McCain would do well to pick a candidate who is a real conservative.  I would like to suggest he choose one because he is on thin ice with the base of his party.  A failed Obama administration is a far better road to go down than a McCain administration that moves conservatism out of the GOP.
 
Reagan took a few issues that the public overwhelmingly wanted addressed and he showed what conservatism can provide in the way of resolution to those issues.  His successes are the reason he won in a landslide when he sought re-election in 84'.  Bush Sr. failed to hold the line on conservatism when he coat tailed the success of Reagan that cost him against Clinton in 92'.  Most would say it was the Perot factor, that is simply not true.  Perot would have never been on the map in 84' against Reagan.  Then we have W. Bush who has looked more like Reagan than his father.  He won in 04' because he held the line his popularity faded when he allowed liberalism to set the agenda.  Still I as well as many other conservatives would rather vote him to a third term over the current crop despite the polls.
 
McCain threatens to take the party back to the dark days.
 
Please John give us a real conservative reason to vote against Obama. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can your candidate answer these Immigration questions

Immigration

1a) Are you in favor of making American English the official language of the United States of America?

1b) Is it now time to stop the practice of teaching core curriculum public school classes in foreign languages?

1c) Do you consider Mexican Spanish a foreign language when it is used as a primary means of communication in the US?

2a) Would you be in favor of returning ALL criminals to their home countries who are in the US illegally and criminals with temporary status.

2b) As it concerns the 14th amendment ,children born to illegal aliens. This seems to be a tough issue to because it deals with innocent children. Would you consider reforming laws that more clearly define the exceptions to the 14th amendment to include children born to guest workers, criminals and all those who refuse to get in line for a green card? Or does the 14th amendment already make it clear in Sec. 2 that “other crime” could constitute an exception for all who have violated our immigration laws?

2c) Would you be in favor of zero tolerance as it relates to enforcement?

 

3a) A lower end income taxpayer has to perform a trade for less to compete with an illegal worker alien (IWA). Do you believe that denies the poor and middle class workers in America the right to work in a free market economy.

3b)Do you think the illegal aliens or those who hire them want that to stop?

 

4a) Should the US government provide guest worker programs to companies who feel they have a right to have labor at a specified rate of pay?

4b) As it relates to guest workers isn’t any measure to make retroactive immigration reform just a scheme of price fixing the labor market?

4c) What possible benefit can a guest worker program have on the “poor” and the middle class of this country?

5a) Should states most affected by illegal human labor smuggling be permitted to sue the federal government and be allowed to enforce current written law?

5b) Does lack of immigration enforcement weaken other law enforcement efforts concerning drugs, gangs, and other crimes of violence?

6a) Do you think a worker in a hazardous work zone is in danger or possibly a danger to others around him/her if that person is unable to communicate in English?

6b) Wouldn’t a law banning hiring practices by all enterprises that require bilingual or other foreign language backround better protect the rights of the American worker?

7a) Can we solve the problems of health care and education without addressing the issue of illegal immigration.

 

8a) Do you support a southern border fence as passed by the 109th congress?

8b) Do you support using legislation to encourage illegal aliens to return to their own countries voluntarily?

8c) Is there ever a time or place you would consider endorsing a $250 billion plan to mass deport all person in the US illegally?

8d) What if we were attacked by a terrorist who came over our southern border? Or if the terrorist is an illegal alien?

 

9) Do you believe current illegal aliens want citizenship or do they just want things to stay the same?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part 2 Q & A Topic the Economy

Chris Knowlton gave me this no holds barred interview!!!

So I asked him question on these five major topics of intense political discussion. They are education, the economy, immigration, National , And finally World issues. But really shouldn't every politician be running to the microphone to assert their position on either side?

Well don't hold your breath, find out!!!

Mr. Knowlton is a man who is running for congress in the Missouri 5th District House Primary race. This is the second segment of 5 questions these address the topic of the Economy.

Economy

 
 Bootheel Buzz:
1) Is it fair to say that a direct link can be made between the high cost of fuel and the weakening dollar in the overall US economy?
 
Chris Knowlton:

In some ways. Trade in general led by Oil has placed this drain on American wealth, with Trillions of dollars leaving our pockets for countries that have no love or allegiance to our way of life. China, Saudi Arabia and others have different goals than our nation does and with the accumulation of wealth, which we provide to them, Dictators do what they generally do. They manipulate things to their favor.

Bootheel Buzz:
 
2) Do support legislation to end all earmark spending?
Chris Knowlton:

Yes. While earmarks would be a very powerful tool for the minority who may not be able to have their appropriations considered while not in power. I feel that it is a breech of trust. The legislators are to play within the system and not go around it. This sends a bad message to the country, that they are above the law and are willing to skirt their own policy’s to get what they want, which is usually expressed with money from the general fund or tax policy’s that exempt their favorite benefactors. So, I would do my best to end earmarks.


Bootheel Buzz:
 
3) Would you support Fair Tax style legislation, that taxes you based on what you spend?
Chris Knowlton:
 

Yes. My plan is slightly different than the book lays out. I would tax citizens 5% and non-citizens 10% (and imports) from their checking accounts. Citizens would buy back American debt with 4of the 5% with the remainder going to the Federal budget. Companies would also send 1% to the Feds while splitting the 4% equally with their employees. Our non-citizen 10% would go directly to a fund for the states. Those funds would be equally divided by the number of Representatives and Senators for each state. That caucus would present a spending plan to their respective state legislature for agreement prior to disbursement.

This plan would eliminate all federal taxes, the IRS and reduce the size of the Federal Government so that it might live within its means. It would also place the debt of this nation in the hands of interested parties, its citizens.

 
Bootheel Buzz:
4) In the 80’s we had “Where’s the Beef” when it came to a good hamburger. When it comes to climate change can we at least ask. What happened to the next ice age, nuclear destruction, acid rain, the ozone layer and now, “where is this globe a warming”?
Chris Knowlton:
 

You are correct. There are some productive things that have come out of the Manmade Global Warming issue. It has shown how poorly our schools have done in critical thinking and history. It has exposed those who would control everything in our lives to be tyrants in "De-sky’s" and it has shown how emotional issues can glaze the eyes of normally intelligent people. I trust that the Europeans and Canadians that signed on to Kyoto and have failed to meet their 2007 Carbon levels may be learning their lesson. Restriction policy’s truly hurt real people and Carbon only helps plants.


Bootheel Buzz:

5) The Democrats often point to the futures market as the main cause of record high crude oil prices. Is this an oil price bubble and would these prices increase or decrease with an increase US oil exploration?

 Chris Knowlton:

This is a supply vs demand question. The Southeast Asians and the Pacific Rim countries are growing rapidly with our exported cash. They like to use the U.S. as a model of what they can offer their population. They want better food, a nice place to stay and better stuff. And then they want freedom of movement, which is where cars and fuel to move them come in. We have it they want it and with this newfound prosperity they will not be denied. Oil is a big part of their success as it has been with our success. It currently drives this economy. If we kept some of our money here and some of our oil jobs here we would be in better shape in many areas. Drill here, drill now and pay less.

 
Bootheel Buzz:
 
6) Is there any chance we can conserve our way to energy independence without huge new advances in technology?
 
Chris Knowlton:
 

No. Those who believe that conservation alone are hopeless and have little understanding of markets. Being a good steward of what we have been blessed with could be emphasized more. One must put something in to get something out. If there is nothing to put in there will be no resulting output. This may be what some want. I assure you that I will fight this to the bitter end. And with my 60 year plan will have totally green power production a reality. But we are not there yet.

This concludes the economic portion of our interview catch the next part Immigration as we ask Chris all the hard questions any congressman will have to answer as a member of the US House of Representatives.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US House can stop Amnesty

7/20/08

 

To those on the fence about congress,

What does your next congressman say about illegal immagration?  We can not fix our economy, healthcare, social security, gas prices or any other major issue unless we enoforce the law on citizenship in our country.   
Why not amnesty for everybody?

For every crime ever committed anywhere in these United States. Open every prison, let all the child rapists, drug dealers and murders out. If we just give them a chance, right? The world looks down on us anyway, we have one if not the highest population rates of prisoners anywhere. Then all drug and alcohol rehab clinics, reinstate drivers licenses, forgive all debt and call for peace. They know what they did is wrong and won’t possibly make the same mistake twice if we just change, if we just give hope a chance.

Representatives to our legislature will they make the same mistakes? Will your US Senators, or member to the US House of Representatives continue to give you that blank stare when it comes to the 6-10%. The people who came to our country and are here illegally.

What do 25+ million illegal aliens do that exempts them from our legal system? How can amnesty fix the 10% that comprise 35% of our prison system? Will we discuss this again in another 20 years? This time will the estimate be 200 million illegal, 75% of our prison population?

A lower end income taxpayer has to perform a trade for less to compete with an illegal worker alien (IWA). That denies the poor and middle class worker the right to work in a free market economy. Do you think the illegal aliens or the those who hire them want that to stop? Those who say we need guest worker programs are addicted to slave labor? We have a simple problem in this country and that is a free market understanding. The same politicians who are pushing the free trade all over the world, are the same ones who want to restrict it right here in America. Huge manufacturing companies are in-sourcing IWA as a means of cost control. These short term cuts are a time-bomb that will end all US manufacturing done by US citizens.

The US House of Representatives is a seat we see every 2 years. The true power of the House resides in the tenure of that member. He/she must continue however to do that in a way that represents the views of the party and a majority of all the voting/non-voting constituents. The persuasion of fact versus popular opinion/deception is powerful especially on a complex issue such as citizenship. It takes courage to stand up to the mob rule that seeks to distort the illegal immigration debate. By sending people to the House who oppose allowing amnesty we have a say in the process. However there are many among us who would say there are just jobs Americans don’t want to do. That statement is a lie, Americans have done the jobs other nations can’t or won’t do. Americans won’t enter into a slave labor market which is what skilled and unskilled labor is fast becoming in this country. The farmer has to pay a picker $20/hr to get his crop out of the field if that is what a it takes to get good help. That farmer doesn’t have the right to enslave a Mexican citizen into poverty.

Every civil society has laws, how these laws are applied is just as important as the reason for having them in place. America’s population consists of people from every known race. Where else in the history of the world has one nation gone to war for the interests of another? To the sacrifice of a million or more of its own people, all those many more injured, and not to mention baring the expense. America then returns these lands to people who have long cried out to America for freedom. Our founders have passed these awesome responsibilities to us. A torch of freedom has been entrusted to us, their dream of a world of individual liberty and responsibility. Never should we seek approval of nations who treat their people like battered women. A true humanitarian is almost always an American. Being one who is true to that tradition I says, “let us free Mexico, not fall to their level.” The fact is America sets the standard in everything we do. Some nations see the prosperous effects of individuals having the power of freedom, they are our allies. Political powers in any nation of any stripe see this as a threat to the power they have over their citizens.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part 1 Q & A Topic Education

Chris Knowlton gave me this no holds barred interview!!!

So I asked him question on these five major topics of intense political discussion. They are education, the economy, immigration, National , And finally World issues. But really shouldn't every politician be running to the microphone to assert their position on either side?

Well don't hold your breath, find out!!!

Mr. Knowlton is a man who is running for congress in the Missouri 5th District House Primary race. This is the first segment of 5 questions these address the topic of Education.

Education

Bootheel Buzz question (1):

As a businessman you know the value of a satisfied customer.

Would you support a tax break or a voucher system to give the right of choice to parents whose children

are in failing public schools to pay for their cost of a private education ?

Chris Knowlton answer (1):

America is ask to look toward new and unproven resources for Energy and by the same people we are forced to try new and innovative methods of schooling our best asset, our children. The evolutionists say that things must be allowed to evolve, yet they hold tight the accreditation and funds for home schooling and vouchers. The first to point out the inconsistency gets their choice of seats in the classroom.

Bootheel Buzz question (2):

Would you be in favor of higher quality education at a lower price if it meant privatizing all K through 12 education services?

Chris Knowlton answer (2):

In theory, yes. Far too long Americans have passed bond issues and fully supported the local school districts as we were ask. In many areas the education of our children and future is more than adequate. Still the option of going private or religious should not be legislated against, just to hold the existing system to its low standards.

Bootheel Buzz question (3):

Would you vote for a bill that restricted educational services to those who are legal citizens?

Chris Knowlton answer (3):

Sadly yes. We are a nation of loving, giving people and we open our arms to immigrants. At some point the wheels fall off. Prior to that happening to the children of our legal immigrants and citizens, I would ask for action to be taken against these lawbreakers.

Bootheel Buzz question (4):

Would you be in favor of all core curriculum classes being taught only in American English?

Chris Knowlton answer (4):

Without question. With English being the language of business, we do an injustice to those we allow to fall behind in this department.

Bootheel Buzz question (5):

The numbers don’t lie since to 60s‘ the decline in overall inner city public education is undeniable.

Would you support a removal of the US Department of Education and transferring that power back to the States?

Chris Knowlton answer (5):

My last few answers lean that way. I want to eliminate the duplicity of government. The layers of endless paperwork for job security and control. I bet that if we reduce the controls in education and other areas we will achieve better results. That is the American experiment and experience. But these are touchy feely subjects that sway many votes and the hearts of many.

 

This is the first of six parts of an interview with Congressional Candidate Chris Knowlton of Missouri's 5th US House District in the GOP primary race.

So call your congressional rep or your senator and compare his/her answers and then your own you might be surprised at the results.

Contact info for GOP primary candidate:

Chris Knowlton's Campaign MO 5th

P.O. Box 266383
K.C., Mo. 64126 info@PrimaryChris4KC.org

Tags: interview  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The PaperTiger Conservative

Paper Tiger Conservative

What is a Paper Tiger Conservative?

A Paper Tiger Conservative is someone who is not a conservative. 

The term is used to describe an action that attempts to disguise their own liberal shortcomings with conservative talking points.  By not upholding the principles of small government, individual liberties, and strong national defense.  This individual is also liable to switch positions frequently on the same issue. A key element uses a projecting of their own behaviors on those around them to confuse the issue.  They seek the status of equal and the benefits of a victim. They are both the ying and sudo-yang of our party.  They call for balance from the outside and cause destruction from within.  While they oppose the party platform they seek praise from the opposition.  They call this a compromise, they call it bi-partisanship.  The blood letting Tiger seeks to ensnare the ignorant and weaker in propaganda, emotion and inuendo.  Its' recluse instincts allowing it to veil it's failures by seizing a moment to change the subject.  This person would make a grade A democrat except the one thing they lack is positive popularity.  They are really the misfit liberal whose life is devoted to the quest of being accepted by those it looks up to the left.

AKA: JOHN SYDNEY MCCAIN
Every Democrat who won against a Republican incumbant in 06' did the same thing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PanicRats, Party Turmoil and What's Next????

Is it really true that someone let Bush out?   For a lame duck W. is making people wish they could vote for him in a third term.  While McCain continues his assertion that he is the only candidate whose lack of manhood allows him to straddle the fence.  Obama is floundering in his parties innablility to close the deal.  The energy crisis they created and their failed war policy has given President Bush new life in the last 6 months in office.  The trickle down of these failed poilcies for the environmentally ill will result in the ousting of the freshmen democrats elected in 06' to the house who ran as conservatives.  It doesn't matter how they voted on a bill a mandate to ..."throw the bums out" is at hand!  Global warming is precisly the hoax that caused the prices of food to sky rocket, the democrats solve it by increasing food stamps in the Farm Bill.  This hoax causes gas to double they act as if supply and demand is an illusion.  They promise to change the trend if elected to the majority in congress, they get it, and the price doubles again.  They state we can't cause a change by increasing supply, insisting that demand is the problem and we must lower ours to cause the world prices to go down.  Read that again, we can't change the price by drilling yet we can by lowering our demand, people who believe this think about inhaling oxygen before they take a breath.
 
If our economy is going to go to heck who is going to pay for everybodies healthcare?   If we are loosing the war where are all the news reports?
 
Will they let Osama out on bond if captured?  If he gets aquitted on a technicallity should he be given citizenship if he refuses to leave?  Will American soldiers, and victims families from 911 actually have to take the stand and relive this to convince you he ordered these attacks?
 
Will we ever get GOP candidates with real conservative stones???
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mcnuclear campaign issue ILLEGAL immagration

This man is a fool. We are talking about illegal aliens JOHN!!! Not legal aliens or American citizen, quit being such a bigot Mcshame on you all Hispanics are not illegal aliens. Not all(most) illegal aliens are in fact Mexicans. Not to be confused with AMERICANS. Most in this who party believe in a free market economy. Others claim to unless they can get a Mexican to do it cheaper. They are the raicst, the bigots and we are the Just ones.  Our civilization relies foundation of individual liberty, part of which is the creation of laws that protect the people and establish order.  When laws are written, passed and signed by the representatives of the People of these Untied States and are not enforced the trust in that foundation begins to errode.  We cannot afford another Amnesty Bill.  Americans will do any job, any time, and  any where no matter what we hear on the news.  If the free market determines a landscaper is worth $25/hour Americans will be there.  The free market value of an attorney is between $200-$1000 and up.  Some of the RINOs in our party seem to have the idea that a man can support himself forget about his family on $15/hr. Wrong do the math.  The idea that Mexican slaves are needed to prop up our skilled and unskilled labor operations is nonsense.  So I am really sick and tired of hearing the talkradio parots crow about the tax rates the upper 10% pay.  Most who hold these ignorant opinions can't see past the fog.  The fact that when you artifically restict free trade within private sector of America you are infact leveling taxes on skilled and unskilled labor.  Not all Americans fall into this victim need a desk job crap.  Some choose that because they are good at what they do, I imagine they cut their own grass because they like driving the mower too.  Someone needs to do the job Rush Limbaugh doesn't care to do.  A $15/hr job was good money in the 70s' but many skilled labor postitions paid twice that back then.  Just remember if you own any stock in a major US manufacturing company odds are your dividends rely on the Mexcian slave force.  The market has created the poverty we pay fore in taxes.  The solution is a flat tax and concentrated law enforcement on the Mexican slave trade network opperating inside the US.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi needs to stay in her coffin// the environmentel bubble is about to POP!!!

What is the strangest thing about this election cycle is that the GOP appears as if it may be keeping the powder dry.  This is an oil thing Barrack we do understand why gas is $5, and yes you are dancing in the streets about it.  As for the future former speaker Grandma Plasticosi this sham is about to crap out.  If Bela Lugosi could see you now he would be proud, she carries on scaring the crap out of people in his image. 
The real crux here is whether or not we should just keep our mouthes shut and let their convention tear their party apart or try to influence the debate.  I say, mum is the word here.  We still have more than 3 month to watch this play out.  If we don't let the the dum-masses figure this out themselves the sheeple in our party may cross the isle.
   We all know the sheeple our nominee is one of them.  But like his flock-mates he to sways to the winds of change.  He to will conciede public opinion no matter how concieded he has presented himself as in the past.  McCain is a true blue "wet fingered" politician, his mission "glory" in the eyes of as many Americans and Non-Americans, to be all things to all people.  The biggest difference between him and B.O. is that Barrack is bought and paid for.  McCain is to but by his lust for popularity, in the spotlight of the oval office he can't hide behind the other 99 chairs in the room.  He will have to care about our opinions or we could make him an instant "lame duck", but that would take a bit of courage.  Something our elected leaders lack.  So don't stop the drum beat just keep a consistant rythm the pace will become maddening to them as they look for away out of the lambrinth their ignorance has created.  Amplifying this retoric to soon will only serve to rescue them from this reckless policy of evironmental equality which has trumped logic, sanity, and the human condition.  We are the so called party of the "rich", they champion spending bills in the name of the "poor".   If we attack this in the right way starting on the last day of their convention this could drive a wedge through the core group of voters sought by the democrats this election cycle.  But we have got to back off and allow them to cause their own party caos until they are at their weakest point.  When the bublle burst the best October suprise ever could be a State Department investigation into Algore and all the "carbon credit" type businesses whose activity is thought to have cause a 300% increase in price of oil in the last 9 years.  Squarely place the tail on the donkey, and watch the political machine move to the right, house, senate and yes even John "boy" Sydney McCain.  Great times could be awaiting with solid majority pickups in 08' and 10'.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Trophy Wife

Now I'm your normal adverage middle 30 something kinda a guy I know the difference between trickle down economics and starvation poverty.  You do to, its' good versus evil, so when I look at these two would be first ladies.  Both very attractive women, who seem to have an intelligent grip on the english language I wonder how it is the gloves have not come off?  Neither gal has a single other notable trait in common.  The fact that I see McCain as rigid, calculated, possibly left of the party platform ruins him as a "real" man of vision.  He needs a human element, which he can onl get one of two ways.  The first is to appoligize and admitt he was wrong all those times he sat left of the isle.  The other is to showcase Cindy his wife to woo the public masses with her charismatic charm (or make her that way and repeat step 2).  Because one way or another, don't let the cheerleaders fool you they root harder for a loosing team, McCain has no GOP love and if he can't get it then his wife will have to pick up the slack.  Unless camp Obama allows Michelle to tell us how she really feels, then McCain might beat Nader but let us not take the chance.  Plus it would lighten the mood if John talks about his lovely wife instead of political bipartisianship on the MsMedia.

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Campaign Finance Laws and B.O.

Campaign finance laws

Do they exist in the case of B.O. Is it ethnic or is it a failure to recognize the origin of his campaign. All to often we look to DC as the pit of political demise, and it is. What we have forgotten however is that, "if the Mayor is black he can smoke crack" and that they want to make it illegal to defed yourself. The other thing we foget about is Chicago, doesn't a candidate who from the land of political deserve scrutiny? The man has done everything to embrace.......the local community in Chicago, he goes to the biggest "black church" for 20 years only to leave after his pastor(friend) Jeremiah Wright forced to retire.  He has accociated himself with Oprah to help launch his political movement agaist the lefts N.A.G.als.  The closet company he keeps but denies knowledge of their conduct has to go well beyond his  relations with ACORN, Ayers, Wright, Phlager, even Mrs Obama tells alot about who Barrack Huesien Obama really trully is.  Look at  Dennis Kuk-sin-itch he met his wife at a table dance.  Barry he met the Mrs at a protest ralley.  Her true feelings matter because be definition a marriage is a union, they are teammates for the same cause, their family unit.  What she says, he does if you are married you know if you are not you either no better or haven't been told the right way yet.  Chicago and politics is like pitbulls at the daycare it don't work.  You wouldn't casually drop off your kid at a house with a new pitbull nextdoor.  Chicago has a long reputation for fraud, coruption and huge ammounts of racism.  If you can't spell the word racism by the end of Kindergarten you can vote!!!  Where is Obama getting all of these 10s' of milliions of dollars? Why is he really not going with a publically financed campaign?  Who are the real donors to the campaign?  Will it be tolate before we ask, why is the MSMedia protecting him from any unscripted critism?

 

This entire cycle has been a complete Obamanation




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Bin Lying Extended comment

Has anyone noticed that Obama has become the "Black Candidate" for president?  He really reminds me of Clinton when you get down to it.  Axelrod tells him what to say and when he doesn't he suffers a case of "foot in mouth".  This man is a bigger phony than McCain which is the only reason I am starting to lean toward the McGOP.  I will never vote, campaign, contribute or otherwise support McCain.  He can run on his service record all he wants, I don't care.  His service to this country as an Airman is not an issue in my mind.  What is is his constant ability to pick up and go over to left at the drop of a poll.  His conduct as a member of the Senate is dispicable.  That said, Obama is the recreation of every dictator who has ever charmed his way into power.  He comes with many who seek the absolute destruction of the "American Dream".  The speeches he gives and the color of his skin are his whole platform.  There are those who are tired of the belly aching for a "black president", they would cast a vote for anyone to kill the arguement.  Black Americans most of whom will cast a hipocritical vote for him without regret for their own racist choices.  The same holds true for those who only see color who will not for for him.  The content of Obama is so wrought with anti-Americanism it begs this writer as to what threshold if any exist for black Americans.  To throw their vote and this country into the abiss of communism and inevitable anarchy.  Like I said previously I will not pull the lever for John Sydney McCain distingushed POW, American war hero and dispicable Senator.  However may God save of from this curse of an Obamanation.  In doing so I may have to come home from the voting booth shave every bit of hair from my body, shower in bleach, and go on a liquid diet for the 73 days between election day and inarguration day.  But I will be damned if I let myself cast a vote for anyone other than who can defeat Obama.  If that is McShamnasty I only hope he doesn't vaporize the GOP in the eyes of those to ignorant to become informed among us.
 
One thing I would encourage the conservative faithful as well as the easily lead to the isle if there (is) was a third pary candidate (not Barr) but an actual kick dass taking no prisoners conservative rock with a hint of a snowballs chance of beating out McCain for second I would expect true conservative McGOPers to drop Mcshamnesty like a Led Zep if not I'll take my bleach and vote for McMoped but don't expect me or any other real conservative to kiss and tell.
 
Party loyalty is what keeps us at arm length from him and to say we have no choice but McGOP is at best a hypocracy.  If McCain really wants my vote he needs to appolgize and explain his previous actions that were a 180 from his "parties" offical postitions and the fact that he stood with the other side making false accusation, insinuations, and reading from the script penned by the Democrat left.  I have only one true hope if he is however elected that is what he did through the Bush term he did out of spite and that he will turn it back on the left.  If he serves consistant to his campaign message we will need 10 million men dressed in American Indian garb and 100 trash trucks packed with Tea and a re-enaction of the "Boston Tea Party" to get a real conservative of the bench.
 
But that pakes party loyalty to you know?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Haditha

To all this may concern send this letter to your local media that calls our soldiers murders and our cause unjust.  It is no wonder that they crucify our heros before they even get a trial but loose interest after they win I sent this letter to my local See-BS news station and yes this is how I really feel
 
 
  Lt Col Chessani one of what his superiors describe as the finest marines lost his carrer two years ago when Time magazine,  Congressman Jack Murtha (D) PA, and the drive by media took ran with a story about his involvement with the deaths of 15 Iraqi civilians caught in a crossfire between our forces and insurgents.  He was just aquited of all charges in one of the biggest investigations this country has ever launched from the Pentagon including Iran Contra.  He and his family lost two precious year of their lives with along with the six children they are raising in a model of a family unit.  Yet all your news cast focuses on is gays, a storm crest and the next good family caught in the media crossfire.  You owe this man and his co-defendants and the lies told about them a segment or an hour special on the lies Time, and Murtha have told to the Amreican people.  This is an outrage CBS and others covered this as if these men were caught redhanded.  They were criminals before they were even so much as charged with a crime.  Now you and others hide like the cowards you are under your little desks afraid to report the news that to date none of these men charged with the so-called murders of alleged innocent Iraqis can be found guilty.  You sir are worse than a terrorist you are a traitor to call these men what you have without cause, for political gains, to inflame anti-war retoric you should be hung by a stiff rope on a tall tree in the center of town after a trial as an example infront of your family to protect those who fight and die to preseve this land you trash on a daily basis you sick POS.
 
Derek
Jackson MO
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

$2.00/gallon within a YEAR!!! the oil market crash for dummys

Is it big oil?.......Well not American big oil, maybe world big oil.  Is it the futures market that has caused the spike in trading prices?....That only takes common sense to see.  But all those things are free market capitalism which has been the blessing of our great nation.  Maybe the problem isn't that these things exist it is how we react to their influence in our lives.  For instance if we know that our biggest oil company Exxon is one of the smallest oil comapnies in the world why do we only hear about their profit?   Why don't we ever hear about the profits made by OPEC?  Now OPEC is not the problem either but it would tend to put the greater issue into proper perspective.  The futures market is new but so once was the internet.  If we take an OMG this is bad approach to  it we might see the errors in limiting our market share.  That would have a huge negative impact on our economic structure.
 
I propose  that if any type supply disruption would cause the price of crude oil to rise then any expasion of supply would cause it to fall.  There are those in the DNC who say that drilling in ANWAR would not effect the world market for ten years.  Then there are those on our side who say but Clinton vetoed it over 10 years ago.  When the futures think the market is slowing in supply the price goes up so if the market sees the supply overwhelm demand in the FUTURE it would stand to reason many investors would try to sell before the bottom fell out.
 
There are those in our goverment who say we need to tax "big oil" and their excessive profits.  Then their are those in our media who excuse these profits as being inline with cost of production.  Both are false, oil companies are making hand over fist more profits and the skew their numbers  the same way big business limits profit sharing.  It is the samer way a company buys a tax write off.  But there are ways to manipulate the market just by threatening to increase supply.
 
If tomorrow the US Congress and Senate passed authorization and the president signed into law that we would allow the construction of one gasoline refinery every five years built in the US until the price of oil dropped to $50 a barrel.  If the same parties agreed to incrementally increase exploration for oil in all regions by 20% where oil is currently extracted and 50% in costal area where other coutries are already drilling.  Then put a five year review date and in the same legislation said we would move post haste on to the ANWAR exploration project if oil had not gone down to within $50 a barrel I cannot imagine these speculators staying in this over inflated market.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Freedom of Religion Ammendment

A New Arguement for Choice in Education

I used to think as I am quite sure most of you that the origin of "Separation of Church and State" arguement was penned by Thomas Jefferson in 1802 to the Danbury Baptists.  After doing a bit of research it is easy to see why less than honest sources of media would not want you to know that is in fact false.   Jefferson was pointing out the how to interprut the 1st Ammendment. Writing that in the 1st Ammendment to our Constitution the Founding Fathers specifically wrote of religion ahead of speech.   The intent is to show that government has no right to obstruct religion. The 1st Ammendment says:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The orgin of this concept is what in fact spawned the freedom of religion from the Roman Catholic Church and the prodestant revolution.  Martin Luther wrote the Doctrine of Two Kingdoms of God.  I believe the the book was titled On Secular Authority.  He writes that God requires a voluntary faith and that goverment has its' place in life and property matters but not in matters of faith.  The founding fathers often refered to the writings of Luther who created the concept of separating religion from government control.  Jefferson was not interested in removing all references of God from public view.  He was concerned that people be allowed to worship when and where they pleased. 
 
In the 10th Ammendment it says:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Meaning the US Department of Edjucation is a direct violation of the 1st and 10th Ammendments.  Also the 9th Ammendment which says:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
That means the 10th carries the same weight as the 1st and could further be taken to mean that because religion come before speech
in the 1st it does so as a measure providing for free religious speech,  religious press, and the right of religious assembly. 
The Lutheran Church forbids its' members from joining clubs that have a belief system that contradicts the Word of God as written in the Bible.  Children register in public schools that teach anti-Biblical concepts.  So the fact that my daughter or yours, or your son who attends a public school that teaches evolution science and forbids the Word of God is violating your 1st Ammendment rights and mine.  Because the honest interpretation of the separation is to protect religious views from government control.
 
 
The school choice arguement always gets caught up on the "Sepparation of Church and State" issue.  The 1st Ammendment was actually the reason most risked their lives in coming to America.  It should always be refered to as the Freedom of Religion Ammendment. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive