All you have to do is watch or read any major media's position on the facts as they relate to the election. So heck yes we're mad but the idea that hatred of lies is race related or has anything to do with a party is just plain ignorance. To illustrate my point look back into the primary process and even earlier into decisions and how they are framed or ignored by the media.

1) Bill Ayers founded a terrorist organization in the 60's that was worse than the single act of terrorism committed by Timothy McVeigh against the United States. Although McVeigh was executed for his crime, the story was the complete focus of media for months if not years. Bill Ayers stated ironically enough in an article published on 9/11/01 in of all places the New York Times that, "I wished we would have done more". Why wasn't that a part of the 9/11 commission investigation, did he know something? This man obviously hates America, hates our role in the world and at one time based just on his own admissions committed acts of treason against it, treason!!! He still displays his contempt openly, anyone who directly associates with such an individual, who wants to lead America should absolutely answer the obvious questions about those connections. But the media has been running interference instead of reporting the story. If there was nothing to it, why then has it sparked such outrage that they have chosen to bury the story?

2) The economy stupid, we are in a self imposed crisis but the exact cause is not the topic of discussion. In fact on either side of the isle the choice to address the root cause has been taken off the table. Is it the third rail or a path to redemption? I think for John McCain it is the latter, he must pin the tail on the donkey. We are simply here because of CRA, the fraud of global warming, and the elimination of the free market jobs economy for the middle class worker by way of allowing illegal aliens a silent amnesty. Obama has to stay off the third rail because if the public reaches the correct conclusion prior to Election Day he is finished. The Community Reinvestment Act started in the Carter administration, was strengthened in the Clinton administration and forced banks to take the risks that have caused our markets to collapse under their wake. Obama as a "community organizer" contributed to the intimidation and threats of litigation that led banks to give in. Banks are not in the business of loosing money; they did not cause the problem but rather were the instruments of Liberal politicians that sought to. Global warming is a nonscientific fraud and a scam to redistribute wealth and weaken the American power structure. The cost tops 5 trillion dollars since 1999, yet the facts do not bear out the theories. Since 1999 America has spent 3.5 trillion dollars EXTRA on the oil we have consumed to date. Amnesty has cost Americans more money than any analyst could possibly accurately account for. Whether it be hospitals getting stiffed on bills, schools, entitlements or just a simply the decreasing wages they bring to the middle class worker the presence of 20 million non tax paying indigent people has bankrupted our resources and robbed families of the American dream.

3) But both or all of those issues tie into one singular issue that so enrages Republican voters and that is the double standard in news coverage a fraud unlike we have ever seen. A system by where the political party one belongs to determines the how news is covered and how issues relevant to the facts are addressed. In the case of Barrack Huesein Obama the mere mentioning of his middle name is met with outrage under a false pretense of racism. His associations and past misgivings are off the radar and his past in general is seen through the Medias light of blissful and willful ignorance.

The Republicans see their VP pick Sarah Palin under attack over rumors so far fetched with intent to falsely smear the character of her entire family right down to her 5 month old baby. The see there presidential candidate attacked not for his record but on his service which stands on it's own merit as nothing short of inspirational. If they saw the media go after the Democrats in the same fashion there would be no anger, sure there would still be mild angst, but this anger is quickly turning to hatred as the media power base ratchets up it bogus campaign to get Barrack Obama elected. This campaign Obama and his media henchmen are running is the single biggest political fraud seen in most of our lifetimes. We see ourselves in a third world style political battle that we have tried to engage on the facts with the truth. We have been attacked and defended the personal rhetoric which has all been proven false. Yet we see a man across the isle with an entire record of baggage the kind of man who is in bed with the worst sort of people and interests. We ask questions about his friends, his history, and his vision for leadership. The answers we get irrelevant to our query, we all the hatred that his campaign has projected on our entire group in him and we wonder if our children will have a future if this monster takes the oath of office. The more he avoids the topic, the more he ducks the real issues of trust all persons must pass to become the president the more we see him as evil and unfit. At the same time we see good men and women imperfect as we all are on our side of politics torn down and character assassinated by a sarcastic media hell bent on its dark agenda. This is the root of an anger that could boil over to hatred to immense to contain. We don't speak without facts, we don't go into the lives of their children and we most certainly don't ask for a pass on any of the issues. The only single thing that converts the anger into this just hatred is the media and its willing surrogates in the Democrat party.

Tell the truth is you really worse off than you were in 1999? If you are confused put down the joint put a bag of ice in your toilet stick you head in and flush it until you can have a coherent thought. I asked a very, very simple question. In late 1999 Algore was running on his "global warming" platform, we were entering an economic recession, and American interest were be attacked by terrorist once a year or so. A certain murdering football icon was loose on the streets of America because he bought a racism defense. Have you ever assessed you financial picture? I have, I was working for a company making just enough to juggle my bills, I am now self employed and actually took my first vacation ever in 2005. We now have a balance to the Dinosaur media in AM talk radio and Fox News, and the ratings for most Liberal rags and news broadcast are falling to the point of near irrelevance. We have high speed internet that provide the best fact checking ability when we want to see which of our politician lie to us so we can have the truth in print.

So what is so bad that has anything to do with where conservative influence has brought us? The price of your home may be down because you allowed liberals to write legislation back in the Carter, and Clinton administrations. Google it they call it the Community Reinvestment Act. They forced banks to make bad loans or face litigation through this act and subsequently over inflated the value of your home. I saw this back in 2000 when everyone ridiculed me for renting when a corpse could get a no money down loan. Many of my friends bought into this market above their means and now have home principle loans that are higher than the current market value and their adjustable rates are breaking them. But when banks loan money to unqualified and under qualified borrowers it is an economic time bomb. Now you add the fact that when Gore was running he advocated for $5/gallon gas and what the environmentally ill path to those ends have cost our nations financial picture. I can see why the general perception is that we are worse off.

However think about the fact that if all we had for news was CBS, ABC, NBC, and you liberal local rag of a news paper you can see why I say we would have never gotten to the root of the issue. We can only solve the problem by giving our leaders the power to solve the problems we face. Bush is the head of our government and as its head has allot of influence in the direction we take. Don't confuse that with the absolute power to change anything. Most of that power resides in the body our Senate and in the House which is currently controlled by those who are responsible for the problems I just described. Sure I know Republicans had a measured amount of control and majorities in both houses up until two years ago. Consider this fact when assessing that opinion, the Senate must have 60 votes to pass any legislation the republicans never had 60 members seated at any one time. On top of what the Republicans in the House minority did in rejecting the first bailout bill, or forcing the democrats to lift the offshore drilling ban, and what about how their minority status influenced the immigration debate? So put that into context when you try blaming the Republicans because the Democrats had those same abilities when they were in the minority.

My point is that we need to solve the problems not the way Obama wants to. He sticks his finger in the winds of public opinion then figures out how to spin his position to move things in the direction he wants with public support. John McCain said the bailout was only a tourniquet to the Americas financial future. If you were bleeding and stopped it with a tourniquet you have still got to fix the wound that caused your bleeding he knows that. Obama wants to blame the knife "wall street" instead of the hand that controlled it "the democrat" for obvious reasons.

But if you fall prey to their spin you won't be able to recall life in 1999 or even in 2008 and instead of listening to the words and the speeches look at the cause and effects of the actions of those you elect to represent you in the powers of government.