About Me

Name: King Vinyl
Email: Derekstorck@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Job/Healthcare/Debt/Entitlement problems solved with 1 bill!!!

So we are going to watch as the Supreme Court decides whether or not our Federal Government can force us all to get health insurance...okay.  Why not broadcast the absurdity in this action by proposing a law that would not just fix healthcare but every single problem we face as a nation from illegal immigration, healthcare, social security, welfare, national debt and put a laser like focus on the unemployment problems some Americans face in this weakened economy?
 
What if I told you that one single piece of legislation could do this?  There is nothing to buy, it won't raise tax rates in fact it might be possible to almost simotaniously reduce them.  And what if I told you it could solve the obesity issue, bridge the gap between rich and poor, reform drug and alcoholism and reduce the prison population would you even hear me out???
 
It's very simple really and your going to be stunned to realize all of the possitive impact a law like this could have and unless I miss read it this law is totally constitutional and would be easy to enforce. 
 
It will be called the Jobs Creation Act of 2011.  This law will require per penalty of fine and or imprisonment that all US citizens not attending full time school between the ages of 18 and 65 that are not totally 100% disabled have a full time paying job.
 
By doing so the demand for employment will skyrocket with all the increased demand for serivces.  Welfare and foodstamps would no longer apply to anyone unless totally disabled.  Illegal immigration would become a recognized problem by all citizens as they compete for jobs and expect a fair wage for their services.  The poor would seek to better themselves because their would be an increased desire to achieve higher wages for skills which they would seek to improve as they transition from welfare to the working roles.
 
The national debt would vansih as millions of new tax payers enter the work force.  Even the rich would be required to work so they would either have to get a job or start a business that would inevitably expand the work force.  Social security would be back in the black within 10 years because no self respecting 62 y/o will be taking early retirement because they would have to work for next to nothing to qualify so they and all the new workers would continue to maintain this "trust fund".
 
Oh and healthcare that is solved by eveyone pooling through their employers for benefits instead of the magical government plan that never quite balances the books on how to pay for it.
 
NEXT PROBLEM!!!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Socialism lives in our "free trade" markets

Hey Rush, Sean, & Mark your'e wrong on this because you live in another form of American reality.  Skilled and unskilled workers or what you call the lower 60% of tax payers do not have the same free market you enjoy.  Now don't take this as an attack on your principles rather the reality you may be simply out of touch with.
 
Several years ago I contacted my then congressional representative Tom Tancredo's office expressing my desire that the GOP propose a moretoreum on all Federal taxes on skilled and unskilled labor in exchange for eliminating the subsidies of earned income credit payments to non-tax payers.  I feel then I was totally misunderstood on substance.
 
It is a fact that the only reason illegal aliens exist in this country is to keep down the bottom line of labor costs in these industries.  That alone examples the fact that this is a Socialist market.  As a person who exists in this market I have seen first hand how the illegal alein influx since the early 90's has caused a severe reduction wages paid to persons in most union and non-union skilled labor markets.  This reduction is a direct result of our nations desire to fix prices at artificial levels; that is the very definition of Socialism.
 
What happens in these illegal markets that allows price fixing is the structure of our social welfares entitlement's web of deceit.  The reason an illegal alien can work for a lessor wage than the market requires lies almost solely in the subsidies they recieve from the federal government.  Some examples are as simple as the man of the house's wage being subsidized by the woman working the system for housing, medicaid, food stamps, and energy assistance.  There are also numerous programs with illegal race qualifiers that provide benefits to those who fit in the categoric minority.
 
By eliminating these tax brackets for a period of time we can illuminate the need for a universal free market and expose the ignorance of "guest workers" and the sympathetic worst case senarios always employed by the left as issues invalid to our overall economic health.  This would also place American citizens who do these jobs in a position of equal standings with these illegal aliens and restore a free market model up until we resolve to zero tollerance on illegal immigration.
 
This is really an artificial issue of race because most of those ill effected by these allowances are themselves the minority community elected liberals claim to protect.  This is also not a tax issue because the business community who violate these laws are owned by in large by those who pay taxes at the upper income rates.  While this may impact small business's negatively at first it will also weed out those whose business model opperates outside the written law.  Often times when discussing the topic of illegal immigration we get hung up on the impact enforcement could have on increasing grocery produce prices.  However the result of the increased entitlement outlays due to non-enforcement is slated to have that same result due monetary inflation. 
 
The shame of it all is that we have laws in this country for a reason and the consequence of selective enforcement is a collective negative.  When lettuce is $5/head will we still insist that there is no way an American would become a picker at a free market determined rate of pay?  Is it right to call a market that fixes some prices like food, construction, and agriculture but allows the educational, medical, and legal markets to exploit those who suffer under these unconstitutional constraints?  Is the upper whatever really paying all the taxes or are they simply paying the penalty for corrupting the course of debate?
 
The facts are on my side Rush and I can't agree with the limited scope of your inept analysis on this topic you are simply wrong.  Taxes are not paid in a bubble; public sentitment resists immigration reform because the GOP side of this comes ill prepared to expose the facts in debate.  Many Liberals in the upper income brackets see their 50%+/- tax payments as charity example Warren Buffet.  The only way to get through to these people may be to use these tactics against them.
 
I will at some point ask my representative for an unspecified grant to decimate the realestate industry and it's simple.  I will use the grant money to open office locations in all 50 states and pay all labor costs.  I will seek to hire only illegal aliens requiring them to close sales on a specific number of propeties to remain employed per month in doing so eliminate the commision percentages normally paid to the buying and selling agents.  When my business model is inserted into the realestate market it will shut down the competition because no one will volutarilly pay a commission when they can avoid it.  In the name of affordable housing I will lobby much like those who advocate for affordable lettuce.
 
I will then go after the legal industry using grant money and lowered minority standards to flood the legal industry with grant subsidized lawyers who recieve a salaried rate to shut down courts all over this country.  How? By trying every case infront of a jury, filing all concievable motions and never allowing plea bargins or deal to get in the way with a judgement by ones peers.  Now this industry will not because of regulatory requirements like the Bar Association allow employing illegals.  So we will seek to employee those who are at the bottom of their profession and retrain them to effectively promote this agenda of legal rights exploitation.  Like the ACLU we will demand collective justice and these lawyers will be paid with grant money.
 
If America is going to declare war on the free market through racial precident I say we should engage this race to the bottom with a full court depression of our entire system in order to cause the nescessary reset of these political debates. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hugh Hewitt, Brooks Newmark puff piece in review

Thanks for proving me right yet again Hugh; the RINO in you just can't bear to rock the boat with any independant thought process.  In short Hugh is just another form of lower Democrat because it gives him a slight logical advantage from time to time over the ultra Libs he envies.
 
It really makes you want to jump through the radio when a guy like Brooks Newmark hits softball after softball over the fence. I'd really like to spit off the mound and just see if he can hit the high heat.  British political theater can be so brutally honest but when members of the UK parliment are interviewed by softies like Hewitt they are handled with kid gloves.  The interview has about as much relavence as McCain channeling Judas coming out of the closet for bipartisanship on SeeBS.
 
What irks me the most is that most conservative members of the UK parliment are clones in the McCain/Graham wet finger brigade.  Just like Hugh and all the other RINO's this Newmark character can't seem to get the core issue that is about to consume his countries financial future.  It's remenicent a rat that nibbles around the edges of the truth hoping not to get to much negative attention from the trap.  The problem is that when RINO's accept the premise that any of these social welfare programs have any positive impact overall in our society they fail the test of ever stemming the tide springing the trap on the entire movement.
 
Hugh is like a bubble wrapped child in the hot sun at the edge of the wading pool terrified of his own reflection.  He can see what is probably true but he just can't quite articulate his point to build any sort of momentum so he like a parasitical flea he jump from bandwagon to bandwagon searching for cover in populist oppinion of a mangy dog.  Brooks may very well have to in a political sense maintain a some populist standing but the so called conservatives in the UK; all of them say alot of good things, make impassionante homerun speeches and then resolve to half measures.
 
What UK conservatives, McCainites, and our beloved Mr. Hewitt fail to realize is that the Kanesian model is the antithisis of Conservatism.  We can't tweak it the spending or the entitlements; none of this is to our advantage and will not produce an alternate path of overwhelming economic prosperity to appear if we try to control it.  When Brooks says they have to make sure that as the pare down government jobs and they have to make sure the private secture is hiring Hugh yup yups him like a fool.  When government monitoring something usually stimese growth that is Facism; unless it's financing and directing it as well which is Socialism.
 
Private sector growth in this country or any other will only happen and Hugh almost tripped over it.  When we eliminate not reform agencies within the construct that prohibit investors from seeing return on investment.  Like water business to follows the path of least resistance when too much heat is applied it simply evaporates and moves on.  I do understand Hewitt in the sense that he feels the problem is so complex and greek to so many that it must be distilled into easily decernable chunks.
 
However the whole premise of the Liberal agenda must be challenged for it's true end game not projected as what he calls best intentions gone a rye.  There are simply two kinds of Libs in this world those who are ignorant and those who are evil.  Right now those who are evil are in desparation mode trying to keep the lid on the common knowledge fed to the ignorant by making the issues as complex as possible.  This is why we cannot have an honest conversation with those who are evil because they refuse to set any boundry between fact and theory.
 
Barrack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and the rest of the Democrat elites are of the evil brand; their voters are the ignorant more commonly known as Independents.  These people refuse to pay attention to the play by play of political theater but champion the Liberal media rendition of woe when the ill effects cause them pain.  Never seeing why they trully suffer they react only when the pain becomes unbearable and only until the intensity begins to subside.
 
What Hugh needs to quit skating around is the fact that our government needs a wholesale reformation if we think we are going to pass the torch of freedom to the next generation.  He also needs to get his mind right with the idea that while the WW2 generation and Babyboom have blessed us with many positive contributions they have also chained us to entiltlements.  Social Security is an invalid contract people in both these generations made with a government they collectively chose then to ignore when it came to managing their money.  That ignorance is 100% of what has led us to this place of insolvency and for that they must forefeit their arrangement and hold accountable those who squandered their contributions into genaral funding not kick the can borrowing future generations into a debt that will soon bring with it a war.
 
The myth that Social Security is somehow an unbreakable vow cements to inopperable status this cancer of our body politic.  Trust but verify is a phrase that comes to mind but none have ever called this agencies books to audit it's accounting practices.  If it really were really an honest fund and not a ponzi scheme as it clearly is.  Your nine digit number would be able to produce a balance with an interest rate in a "lock box" you could easily monitor yourself.  Instead it is a lunch box set out with all the other lunch boxes in the hallway of a trial of the honor system the has failed miserably.
 
The nucleus of America's demise are these ticking time bombs of financial mythology so complex no one can ever fix or maintain them.  If we fail and we surely will without total shutdown and emancipation of these programs they will ultimately consume our Constitution, our liberties, and our national sovernty.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Neal Flippin Booztarts

I love the concept of the "fairtax" it's just that I'm not quite sure what would actually end up being different between it and our current mess of a system once it's the law.  No, Neal I ain't buying your book to figure it out.  But I do have a serious question and a serious solution to the problems I see with the fairtax.
 
First off we all know that 23% would be substituted it a purchasing transaction for the "embedded" taxes a product incures on it's way to the consumer.  But I don't understand what the difference is.  Let's say we are talking about an American made hammer you can('t) buy at a hardware store.  I understand the foundery crew isn't burdened with an income tax, the guy who puts on the rubber handle, the sticker engineer, or the hardware store employees.  However does not the wholesale transactions and the raw materials to the plant incure this sales tax and if so is that not embedded?
 
I'm a construction contractor do I charge a 23% tax to my customers and if so who but the IRS would collect that?  At some point the realization of facts has to occur; our tax code is so complex only because the lengths Americans are willing to go not to pay.  It reminds me of welfare checks when Neal was talking about the energy aassistance lines in Georgia.  People will spend countless hours being non-productive to beat the tax code the same way they try to game the system for their heat bill.
 
There are two problems I see with fairtax.  First there is the collection method for this 23% and exactly what industries will pay it and how to rain in the black market that will surely seek to avoid it.  The second is this prebate crap and that is the Led Zep in this whole thing it absolutly sinks fairtax because it to will be so exploited as long as citizenship=residency.  Also families will subdivide their dwellings in order to recieve duplicate payments and the Democrat will surely use it as an extension welfare.
 
The bottom line is you have to drop the prebate it's stupid to star writting checks to people just because someone thinks they need their essentials at an untaxed level.  What the faitax guys should look into is simply providing all Americans with coupon cards.  These coupon cards would give them 23% off to a certain dollar amount determined as their essential outlays monthy.  That way they have got to spend the money to receive a "prebate".
 
Secondly you have got to structure the collection process to require weekly or at most monthly payments by vendors to the government.  There will have to be some sort of a licensing requirement and an enforcement mechanism with strict penalties for noncompliance.  If not this would only seem to be a tax on commercial store sales and would be a boone to ebay, craigslist and garage sales everwhere.    
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Justifiable Homicide as Defined in Radical Terms

What is your instinctual definition justifiable or what is your honest view on the garden variety term of justified when it come to the self preservation or assisted self preservation of another in need?

Our founding is on life’s goals and instinct principles of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness so long as our endeavors allow others the same without our negative influence and vise versa. Our states are charged with the task of overall law enforcement which in places like Colorado and other states there exists a “make my day law”. Which basically authorizes anyone threatened on their own property the right to use deadly force as a measure to protect oneself from lethal aggression.

In places like Texas any person who can legally own a firearm can also if they so choose carry it on their person in plain site of the general public per specific statute . While in many other states permitted applicants must conceal but are allowed to carry their firearms in public for the same general purpose of self protection. 

While a firearm trumps most other forms of physical weaponry available to the common man when properly and successfully used it is the only method that could cause a fatal blow. Knives, explosives and other popular and some more obscure agents of death exist to those who seek to cause death to another man..

To some Islam is a faith that authorizes a justifiable death to all those deny the words of a man simply known as Mohamed. Any person who is seen to insult or publicly deny his teachings is seen as a threat to his existence especially in countries under Sharia Law. Untold millions have been slain to protect his image a man militantly illiterate yet the so called author of a book ;one some see as being the most historically inaccurate yet now ‘PC’ celebrated despite it’s politically incorrect and hate filled message a bunch of nonsense and the biggest piece of garbage pre-LDS called a Koran..

Now right there I have committed Islamic suicide because under their law I forfeit my life by calling Allah a hoax. Islam as a whole justifies my death it’s not just the “moderates” who are actually the fringe but the mainstream who allow death for these actions. Those who disobey this (false) “prophet” as he so calls himself deny his word for word desire that I be executed for my denial of Islam and my mocking of it’s incestual and fictitious roots.

I am of the mind that is a man or woman for that matter rapes or sexually corrupts the mind of someone under 14y/o they should justifiably die the simplest death our society can afford a firing squad, a noose, a hatchet an injection cost a lot more than a rope or brass and let God sort out those innocent .

Now it should and it absolutely must be a measure of last resort a failsafe method only to provide unequaled and lawful security that one should ever be in a position to discharge a firearm at another human being . Any unnecessary or lust full thought at firing a weapon at another human being is akin to cannibalism in my view.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shoes for Mohammed

We have fundamental right to express our outrage at the very notion of any kind of Islamic mosque, temple, or monument to the horrific successes of mainstream Islam on 9/11. The only perversion of Islam is the denial of the hate filled text of the Koran by the near silent radicals who promote a false peace to which there is no historical prescident.

President George W. Bush was assaulted with a shoe which is the Islam equivalent to a one finger salute. The point is we come from much different cultures than our media would like us to believe. As the same people who warn us about threats of violence if someone were to burn a book cheered an assault against our president and sympathize a culture that routinely burns our Bibles and our flag. 

The temptation is a trap; when we are at war as we are in Afghanistan or Iraq our actions; those of our armed forces are micromanaged to a point at which the sons and daughters of liberty are sacrificed and their bodies are burned for the sake of political correctness. Our media will never tell you or I about how young boys are ritualistically raped by their fathers in Afghanistan and how men in Iraq are punished by watching their wives gang raped. But those who assist the head cutters of Islam are said to be innocent victims of American aggression.

Islam is hell on earth there is no equality available anywhere it exists. Allah is the Islamic translation for the name Lucifer and Mohammed is a swine who championed the ideas of treating women as slaves and all those who did not accept his teaching as his enemies.

Shoes for Mohammed is a campaign I wish to launch to allow the Islamic world an opportunity to express itself in as peaceful a way as is possible. Since Islam is too rank with the stench of immaturity and can not verbally express itself we should express our dissatisfaction in a symbolically Islamic level of understanding.

So from now on when your old or outdated but always used pair of shoes become obsolete to your feet consider donating them to your local (community center) mosque by mail only. Islam can’t speak out against what they feel is offensive because their religion teaches ignorance and hate so we must teach this spoiled brat that there are consequences not rewards for ill behavior in American society.

I hope one day to be able to finance an air drop of a pair of used shoes at the gates of Mecca for every pilgrim who enters to send the message that we do not accept the terrorism and violent core of Islam. Our political apparatus preaches to us a to be tolerant of Islam while it veils the true teachings of Mohamed as clearly written in context that Islam exists to kill all who do not submit to it’s evil. 

I encourage all who read this to raid their closets get a flat rate box from your post office and buy a one way ticket for your old shoes and send them and only them nothing else; no hate mail, nothing harmful or threatening only your retired footwear please. We don’t need to give anyone an excuse to change the subject don’t provide a return address just the address of an Islamic Mosque or “community center” and if you so desire write on the inside of the box these words “Shoes for Mohamed” it is an expression of speech without creating an environment for violent confrontation .

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Calm Before A Trojan Horse Armageddon

What are the Democrats really up to? I mean really up to???   Obama’s associations prove his actions are not really ones of an incompetent fool. Every action taken by his administration has been one specifically designed to elicit the desired result.

Democrats are intentionally destroying our economy the ultimate goal is to have two classes one of elites and the other of slaves. Eventually Democrats seek to enslave all of us to the minimum wage and when they can’t they will tax us back to that level. Opposition to illegal immigration , welfare, universal healthcare, and crooked black politicians are all framed as racist because they are simply indefensible. 

Republicans lost power for these two primary reasons scandal and failure to follow through with their conservative agenda. Most of the scandal had to do with trust and money; while the conservative agenda was lost by in large the people. By in large voter eligible Americans are lazy when it comes to the day to day job of defending their individual liberties and freedoms. 

The federal government is designed to operate with an unlimited degree of government control over the people as long as that authority to do so comes by the majority of the people. So to then must it also be constitutional for our government to also be allowed to exist without any individual control over the people from a federal level. But when the people are content and allow discipline to wane on the premise of good intentions it’s as ad if not worse than drinking and driving.

Problem Republicans called ‘RINO’ some have more of a moth/flashbulb moment others are truly deceptive others are just unapologetic Liberals. Charlie Brown keeps kicking and Lucy will say anything to trick him into it no matter how many times he lands on his back. The media is Lucy and occasionally they will promote a Republican as a ”good guy”; but only if it boosts their agenda which is strictly Liberal. 

 Not all Democrats worship at the altar of central control and dictatorial rule it’s some are simply too weak or naïve on their own to resist the momentum of a popular trend no matter how unconstitutional. 

A true test has begun of constitutional and world historical proportion. Will our constitution survive this latest attempt at central control one that has historically only ever been overcome though the act of all out war? Never before in history has there ever been a throwing out as deliberate, as peaceful, or as civil tongued as what we are about to witness. Yet for all the peaceful discourse, every syllable or word framed in deliberate political correctness still our protests, our constitutional debate are met not with honest retort but rather with temper tantrums and outrageous threats.

The only lasting ‘real’ solution is zero tolerance transparency . The next congress should call for a strict limit on the number of text characters allowed submitted as ‘legislation’ for all bills introduced at any level of both the House an Senate. The next congress should act to remove all existing government salary contracts and reset wages for all federal employees including congress to averages more closely aligned with the private sector. Included in that would be an act to strip retirement and pension for members of congress both past and present to the same level of enlisted military personnel..

We can’t fix this mess and we should not try to pretend that we can do so without true systemic change not of our frame work but rather of process we use to evaluate what is or is not constitutional. Our legal system is not enforced on all Americans equally. 

We must eradicate their media, crush their pity party tent with reality and drain the cash swamps of social nonsense programs that are tantamount to slavery   We live in the only country ever known to man where anyone with a positive attitude and a dedicated work ethic can better themselves without exception. The only barriers to success available to Americans are tragedy, dishonesty and Liberalism. If in 60 years since civil right passed black Americans find no ability to achieve these opportunities we all share; I say they are not trying.   By in large Asian, Mexican, South American, Islamic and those descendant of any other race all go about their lives as any other Americans does. Yet the “black community” by in large still refuses to do so.

The problems faced in the “black community” quite simple; illegal behavior is acceptable and laws are enforced on the basis of skin color and a need to obscure the overwhelming statistical data to support blind justice and universal enforced of our laws without exception. The same province of lies is being thrust onto the Mexican American population through an attempt at racially charging the debate on illegal immigration.   The same tactic is used in the “white community” as well it’s called ‘religion‘. There are so many different kinds of “Christian” that it is sometimes not so obvious outside of the circle that one is.

Because united on the same basic goals of individual liberty and a committed constitutional allegiance as our only legal standard is this nations only true hope for a long term survival. Our constitution is perfect in the sense that if “we the people” really feel a desirous need to change it we can legally do so through our representatives by way of amendment. All to often we fall into the trap of allowing our constitution to be set aside for political theater or show.

Is it worth eternal poverty to sit on your thumb for 40 acres and a mule? Should all who live here abide by the same standard of justice? Should citizenship be an act of pity rather than act of allegiance? Can we ever stop the insanity that would see either foreign legal opinion or religious interpretation supplant our constitution?

We must find common ground in our constitution otherwise we fail outright and the further we go away from it the harder it will be to regain any standard of civil order. This is a feat not concurred in a single election cycle but over decades of local, state and federal elections we can mend this greatest hoax ever known to man . Obama may think he has the keys but our constitution leaves that to those we choose to represent us specifically and deliberately not ever giving any one branch, person, or party ability to have “the keys”. It also allocates most of our laws to be matters reserved for the states further deluding any course toward central control.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barrackfather ][

This is like a scene right out of the Godfather 2 when Frankie Corleone (played here by New York Congressman Charlie Rangel) is given an ultimatum to commit suicide (politically) or the mob goes after his family.

We never hear about how William Jefferson is doing or even if he is actually serving a setence for his convictions.

Jesse Jackson and Albert Sharpton are two of the most flamboyant violators of the law and the are permitted to abuse our legal system to advance an agenda because they are black.

Maxine Waters; oh how wrong she was on Fannie Mae , affordable housing and how deliberate she was in getting those evil racist regulators off of their backs. Now she is being investigated on complaints she directed bailouts on banks she owned.

95% of black Americans still think Barrack Obama is doing a good job as president. 

REALLY??? 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Black Racism

It's sickening that the template for most Democrat talking points is often a distortion of historical fact.  I was on the phone yesterday with Clair Mcaskills office to complain about the double standard of racism.  I explained that if white Americans conducted themselves in the same ways as the NAALCP or the BlankPanthers we would hear nothing but that on the news.  I asked why when the role is reversed with facts i.e. video footage of the the events in question and a former US attorney telling us he was instructed not to prosecute "black defendants" why can't we also achieve justice under this system?
 
His answer was shocking to say the least; he stated that after 300 years of slavery in this country we had to understand some of these actions.  Really?  I told him; 300 years where did you come up with that number?  America just turned 226 years old and besides the Civil War ended in the mid 1800's!!!
 
But this is what we are up against; and it is racism at it's core Black Americans are being taught every single day that racism is acceptable because of the historical facts of slavery in this country none of them have ever experianced.  Not only that but no one in America alive today has ever owned a slave.
 
If the true intention is to bring equallity to all people of America which I assert is not the case.  Then there would not be such a outwardly blatent double standard between black/white and how racism is praised by one and condemed by the other.  The Black Panthers don't want equallity they want their own separate classes, communities, and I suspect a Sharia style of justice.
 
We are being baited into a race war but how we need to respond is with a zero tollerance policy toward the ignorances in the Black Community.  Not all Black Americans are apart of the Black Community but all have ties to it.  With a still 95%+ approval rating to president Obama it is easy to point out that his skin color is more than mere coincidence.  Everywhere else in society his numbers are probably below 40% however most of those voter are concerned with the issues of day to day life not revenge and reparations.
 
My thinking is that Democrats in power have always been Klansmen in the sense that they don't see Black Americans as their equal.  They view all minorities classes as exploitable commodities and use their political powers to keep them in chains.  Everywhere you look from education to the workplace Black Americans are considered hanicapped by their skin color while others have no issue with achievement in the same venues of life.
 
So why is it these people are so intrenched in these lies?  How is it that the Democrat Party after founding the KKK is still able to call themselves the Democrat Party?  Why is it that all "racism" is attributed to the GOP or actions of those who seek true equallity?  Media bias, and pure ignorance is the only logical answer.  Black Americans are conditioned from the time of birth to have lowered self esteme because they are bred into poverty by the Democrats who provide them with free housing, food ,education, and healthcare.  The trade off is that they will be trapped in an existence free from any sense of accomplishment, success  and most importantly any chance of equallity.
 
Voluntary slavery is nothing new to the Democrat Party;  which is why they seek amnesty for Mexican illegals as a new victim class of voters for their same exploits.  Hispanics are not as willing to give up such liberties because they come williingly to America to work and their heritage is one more similar to that of European Americans who sought freedom from opression.  Black Americasn are an easier target for the left because they have a huge gap in their heritage because of slavery.
 
Either way nothing the left is doing is providing any benefit to those they claim to be helping.  Only those who push past the masses and seek out their own path ever get out of the projects.  The sad reality is that it is a terrible waste of humanity which unfolds before our very eyes and because of political cowardess Democrats continue to exploit those who have a weaker status like a drug dealer or enabler to ends which provide a benefit to their party but are destroying a culture.
 
This is the suicide pact of the Black Community 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bama-bam-boozed & the news standards

We either tip our hand we have intentions of impeaching this president at the point of our assuming majority control in the House of Representatives or fall squarely into their trap.

Never surprised to hear about what next hypocritical fine prints lie waiting within the thousands of pages of the twisted legalize they call reform. It’s not the “see I told you so” that needs the focus of attention because it’s starting to become obvious to the blindly liberal. We need a direct and decisive course to achieving our political agenda.

What we don’t need is to line up as a scrape goat for what this administration wants to see as the new status quo. Obama has unleashed enough of his agenda that without overwhelming majority takeovers in the house and a veto proof majority in the senate he can outlast us when judged by our weakest links.

Because even the blind libs don’t really believe in their own utopia. It’s just that they have this beef with God and they make up this fantasy of thoughts that if everyone felt the joy they feel at that moment somehow everyone would stay happy.. But beyond that still shot of bliss lies a rage only a dozen cats can tolerate over starvation. Which is why libs still live in America because they would not survive as well anywhere else.

The hippy kids who listen to what the hair plug mannequin Hoolyweiord types are pushing for music, fashion, and oh us the politically correct pose of the day; the old toilet paper in the belt loop surrender.   Well they thought “Hope & Change” could beat up Santa sadly they found out is wasn’t even a video game yet and they may have just seen their best day pass them in their adolescence.

The problem we face is two years beyond this November. This president is daring the House to act on it’s Constitutional authority to check the powers and actions of this administration.    His nonstop crusade to marginalize the judicial branch is not only obvious it is illegal according to our constitution.                                                            

The real game starts in about a months time as the economy will take an “unexpected” positive shift as the stimulus dollars are administered ‘hair of the dog style’ to the economy. Just in time for Christmas but not in time Democrats in the House.   The trap has many teeth one of which being an agenda to condition the American people to lower their expectations for “the common good” on the quality of life.

The first standard is set post a serious recession as to lower future expectations military superiority. General Petraus is not in a position to win because the authority to do so is not his. When the doves cry and the media parrots their calls the declarations of our defeat will come from the mouth of this Commander and Chief. 

Unless we investigate the takeovers, the ACORN’s and Fanny Mae’s ; unless we rise above race politics and tell the left to “move on” when their lies falsely represent our positionss. Unless we expose the truth about the KKK and this new Stockholm slave sydrome the left has infected the black community with by way of entitlement we will ultimately lose.

I once had an attorney tell me he had the judges attention for about five minutes and after that he figured she had already ruled. 

The American electorate is much the same in a sense that Obama was unstoppable because a majority made up their mind he was a good enough black man for the job and it would provide a clean slate for the future of our nations renewal to a cleansing of sorts. Now they men charging from within the horse attacking the foundation of our Republic to deny us representation through deception.

Republicans must insist that we may not just be able to fix this with some power or simple majorities. That we must have a true conservative president in 2012 and a veto proof majority in the senate and house. It won’t work if the RINO’s aren’t on board. I think it is as important to convincing them as it is any other liberal of the pitfalls of Socialism. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Open letter to Rush

Dear sir I have a question for you about the hometown politics of Southeast Missouri. Why is it that Joann Emerson is so safely entrenched in power as the Rep. from Missouri’s 8th congressional district?

Every single election cycle she runs the fence lines declaring her true moderate record. As you know she is a widow and one reason she continues to win reelection is this district affection for the late Bill Emerson. 

She is a wet finger Republican just as you have described on your show today in the mold of Trent Lott or John Mcshame. So at the moment she is riding the wave of conservative discontent.

I don’t understand how we can have such a liberal RINO in the Bible belt whose current husband is a union lawyer.

So I guess my real question is how do we FIRE such a fraud and why doesn’t your brother David use his considerable influences to bring this about?

I think I know the answer because I live here; no offense but is David probably apart of the “good ole boys” club. The same group who ran Rock Finch against Jay Purcell for county commissioner because Mr. Purcell stepped on some toes by demanding our county operate within the written law. Don’t get me wrong Rock is a great guy but he ran on the idea that investigating these allegat5ions were a waste of county recourse. At the same time Purcell’s complaint had to do with private use of county recourses by commission members.

To close I agree with about 98% of your conservative views in fact I have often wondered if my blog or emails have ever made into your fertile mind based on show content.

Godspeed and Goodwill

Your Student
Derek Storck

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lockerbie/BP/boot neck/Obama oil spill Theory

As recently as I can remember many on the left trully believe in some zany 9/11 Bush did it theory. No matter how much evidence contradicts their arguments they just ignore the facts don’t report it and “move on” as they say it.

The other day I heard Chuck Schummer blast BP for having a role lobbying for the realse of the Lockerbie bomber. He then went on to say that there was a link between that effort and an oil contract they long sought with the Libian government. Now all of this may well be true and if laws, trade rules, or other codes of conduct were violated they should be made examples of that .

However there is a very significant monetary link between this administration and British Petroleum that needs to be examined. For instance is it at all possible that at the time this lobbying occurred and BP has since admitted to this effort to some degree that this administration was aware of BP’s actions?   Is it further possible that members of this administration acted in concert or apart from to these same ends? Or maybe not..

Keep in mind Ken Salazar said in ‘his’ words ,”we have our boot on the neck of BP” .

My question to you is this; How long has this administration had it’s boot on the neck of BP? Did Democrats learn of these efforts years prior to divulging their findings? If so was their silence part of some kind of a return for campaign contributions, investing in phony alternative energy programs, or even worse arranging dare I say it; for the worst natural disaster in US history?

Well while I admit to you this may just be a wild eyed theory a whole lot of coincidence and the cliched actions of this administration make me think it might be just a little more to it than that.

For instance remember all the hub-bub about the picture of President Obama with his feet up on the oval office desk while speaking to the Israeli Prime Minister ? Israeli’s knew what the staged photo meant it was Obama’s way of ‘making them an offer they can’t refuse’ minus the horses head (that only happens if he has to ask twice)”. 

When the Iraqi reporter threw his shoe at President Bush it was said to be an insult in Islamic countries throw ones shoe. However in most cultures when a shoe is part of conversation or physical jesture unless discreetly removed it is a sign of direct disrespect of almost the highest order. 

When a president of these United States empowered by our constitution acts outside of his authority to do with majorities in both houses of congress and an even split in the courts without dire threat or consequence what is the motive? Which actions declare Obama’s true alliances if not his visits, speeches, and accolades to the muslim community. 

So were those really the words of Ken Salazar or was he just reading it off a script? I think it was a direct sign to BP of how this administration intends to conduct itself. But were there also other signs such as millions in campaign contributions Obama received? Or what about BP’s image change trying to redefine itself as being on the cutting edge of “green energy”? What about the facts that the labor union own much of BP whose CEO was “someone” to the White House to write a 30 billion dollar check. Our government says it can’t keep illegal aliens out of our country but it can keep the media out of the Gulf of Mexico.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Celebrating a Klansmen

At least in the end Robert Byrd did make a positive contribution to his country that can stand out and be noticed.  While all the media focus is on the his mortal defiance to the concept of term limits some of the rest of us can't help but see the positive aspects to his passing.
 
Now the Democrat party is down to 58 votes and would need to either rewrite the rules (again) or get two Republicans to vote on any legislation they want to pass a possible filabuster. 
 
It also worthy to note that now the Democrat Party (which was the founder of the KKK); can say that they don't have anymore of it's members (...that they know of);(or at least out of the closet) in as a sitting congressmen.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Imposter!!!

No room for the black helicopter theorists we still have to ask the question.  Is this president REALLY on our side???
 
The proof to contradict it is overwheleming by any honest interpretation of fact.  The conduct of this president during crisis was no more accuratly predicted than by the 3am phone call senario first proposed in the Democrat primary race by then Senator Clinton.  Or was it?  Is her assertion really just a cover for the real Obama while the assumption is made that he has our best intentions in mind?
 
The proof is in the details of his actions and just as his previous history clearly shows us Mr Obama has alot to answer for. 
 
The single most inportant distinction between our representative republic and the rest of the world is simple.  Our system of justice is a measure of all men.  Now we have a dictator like character who believes that he is above reproach.  He is challenging the will of the American people to pressure their representative congress to impeach his illegal conduct.
 
History will judge those who gave into the fad of Obama as "stupid".  I predict this man will resign under "threat" of prosecution and dissappear in shame only to seek influence on a global political level some years later.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Consevatism needs now

Awake yet?  Seems as if since the days of Clinton that most Republicans have been in this politically vegetative state.  When anyone on this side of the political isle in elected office expesses an opinion outside the concensus norm it's immediatly tagged to an 'ism'.  We spend so much wasted time trying to defend the loose treads on our imperfect leaders that we lose site of the true nature of their accusers.
 
I could list thousands of examples how the RINO esteemists dominate party protocal into the short sited politcal defensive measures that cost us our only real chance for true change.  It's as if we allow the "big tent" survival theory to override adherence to party platform with zero regard for consequence in the name of popularity.
 
Is there even an example on an Islam of peace or love?  Well just that simple question is now seen by the left as an offense worthy to disqualify our moral structural integrity on the subject.  Has the last half century since the congess passed civil rights legislation produced an equal opportunity?  Or is it at all possible that certain side effect have had adverse consequences to those it sought to protect?  Is the Arizona immigration law about racism or merely about giving ALL it's citizenry the same rights?
 
The sudo motto of the left seems to be 'saying anything necessary, defend everything unsavory with abject ignorance and silent'.  Any criticism is handicapped by an outward bias in media coverage that views anything from the left through a lens of infered tranqulity.  The problem is peace is only possible through preemptive actions not the submissive concession.
 
Conservatives must fight fire with a mentality of mutally assured destructive means to an almost certain ends putting the onus of survival on the Liberal/Socialst model to right itself to the center 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive