Posted by
King Vinyl on Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:24:54 AM
Thanks for proving me right yet again Hugh; the RINO in you just can't bear to rock the boat with any independant thought process. In short Hugh is just another form of lower Democrat because it gives him a slight logical advantage from time to time over the ultra Libs he envies.
It really makes you want to jump through the radio when a guy like Brooks Newmark hits softball after softball over the fence. I'd really like to spit off the mound and just see if he can hit the high heat. British political theater can be so brutally honest but when members of the UK parliment are interviewed by softies like Hewitt they are handled with kid gloves. The interview has about as much relavence as McCain channeling Judas coming out of the closet for bipartisanship on SeeBS.
What irks me the most is that most conservative members of the UK parliment are clones in the McCain/Graham wet finger brigade. Just like Hugh and all the other RINO's this Newmark character can't seem to get the core issue that is about to consume his countries financial future. It's remenicent a rat that nibbles around the edges of the truth hoping not to get to much negative attention from the trap. The problem is that when RINO's accept the premise that any of these social welfare programs have any positive impact overall in our society they fail the test of ever stemming the tide springing the trap on the entire movement.
Hugh is like a bubble wrapped child in the hot sun at the edge of the wading pool terrified of his own reflection. He can see what is probably true but he just can't quite articulate his point to build any sort of momentum so he like a parasitical flea he jump from bandwagon to bandwagon searching for cover in populist oppinion of a mangy dog. Brooks may very well have to in a political sense maintain a some populist standing but the so called conservatives in the UK; all of them say alot of good things, make impassionante homerun speeches and then resolve to half measures.
What UK conservatives, McCainites, and our beloved Mr. Hewitt fail to realize is that the Kanesian model is the antithisis of Conservatism. We can't tweak it the spending or the entitlements; none of this is to our advantage and will not produce an alternate path of overwhelming economic prosperity to appear if we try to control it. When Brooks says they have to make sure that as the pare down government jobs and they have to make sure the private secture is hiring Hugh yup yups him like a fool. When government monitoring something usually stimese growth that is Facism; unless it's financing and directing it as well which is Socialism.
Private sector growth in this country or any other will only happen and Hugh almost tripped over it. When we eliminate not reform agencies within the construct that prohibit investors from seeing return on investment. Like water business to follows the path of least resistance when too much heat is applied it simply evaporates and moves on. I do understand Hewitt in the sense that he feels the problem is so complex and greek to so many that it must be distilled into easily decernable chunks.
However the whole premise of the Liberal agenda must be challenged for it's true end game not projected as what he calls best intentions gone a rye. There are simply two kinds of Libs in this world those who are ignorant and those who are evil. Right now those who are evil are in desparation mode trying to keep the lid on the common knowledge fed to the ignorant by making the issues as complex as possible. This is why we cannot have an honest conversation with those who are evil because they refuse to set any boundry between fact and theory.
Barrack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and the rest of the Democrat elites are of the evil brand; their voters are the ignorant more commonly known as Independents. These people refuse to pay attention to the play by play of political theater but champion the Liberal media rendition of woe when the ill effects cause them pain. Never seeing why they trully suffer they react only when the pain becomes unbearable and only until the intensity begins to subside.
What Hugh needs to quit skating around is the fact that our government needs a wholesale reformation if we think we are going to pass the torch of freedom to the next generation. He also needs to get his mind right with the idea that while the WW2 generation and Babyboom have blessed us with many positive contributions they have also chained us to entiltlements. Social Security is an invalid contract people in both these generations made with a government they collectively chose then to ignore when it came to managing their money. That ignorance is 100% of what has led us to this place of insolvency and for that they must forefeit their arrangement and hold accountable those who squandered their contributions into genaral funding not kick the can borrowing future generations into a debt that will soon bring with it a war.
The myth that Social Security is somehow an unbreakable vow cements to inopperable status this cancer of our body politic. Trust but verify is a phrase that comes to mind but none have ever called this agencies books to audit it's accounting practices. If it really were really an honest fund and not a ponzi scheme as it clearly is. Your nine digit number would be able to produce a balance with an interest rate in a "lock box" you could easily monitor yourself. Instead it is a lunch box set out with all the other lunch boxes in the hallway of a trial of the honor system the has failed miserably.
The nucleus of America's demise are these ticking time bombs of financial mythology so complex no one can ever fix or maintain them. If we fail and we surely will without total shutdown and emancipation of these programs they will ultimately consume our Constitution, our liberties, and our national sovernty.