About Me

Name:King Vinyl
Email: Derekstorck@yahoo.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Hillary is on fire buyer remorse in Denver

Barrack can't do this Hillary is pulling out all the stops these ignorant liberals are lamenting the fact that they didn't give her that kind of speech writing and prep in her campaign.  Hillary is stealing the show, she smoke Michelle Obama and Bill I going to make barry look like a child once he gives his speech.  If she would have given this quality of a speech during the primary Obama wouldn't be on the radar.  I trully don't like her but she is really doing a great job of delivering, but what is telling is the faces in the crowd.  Michelle Obama is stunned at Hillary's full potential.  If Obama would have been white, she would have been the next president.  The liberals threw their eggs in the wrong basket.  She may just woo him into the white house.  Axelrod could have made her a star, but he went the wrong way. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

the case against Romney

So here is it the obvious attacks between John and Mitt could be negative.  But then there is Mitt's wife elitest, arogant, snob that's a big negative.  Mitt fumbled when asked about Iraq, he was against the troop surge and called for a timeline to withdraw.  That will negate McCain's biggest attribute.  Secondly, McCain is fically conservative, under the circumstances financially speaking we need that, badly.  Mitt is "big business" most see that as overseas jobs and illegal aliens, not a good thing for McCain.  John is pro-life, I haven't seen him make a huge gaff there.  Romney would just about do it.  HIs baggage becomes McCain's baggage.  Same with gay-marriage, and gov-healthcare this is a long list.  His state did a lil better than okay at a time when the rest of the country was booming.
 
Oh just in case you thought I forgot, I didn't say anything about LDS I was going to leave that up to Hugh.
 
I want a real conservative C.Powell would be about McCain's speed I would rather see Michael Steele.
 
Just not a primary contender haven't we rejected them all enough for one year???

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Look at the Donkey as his colors run (08')

Look I am not going to pig pile on for one term Senator, 04’ Vice Presidential Nominee, 04’ & 08’ Primary Presidential Candidate, and mega rich democrat trial lawyer John Edwards about what is fact or fiction. Neither will I entertain the notion that his status entitles him to privacy. Obama is running as a community organizer, Edwards is on a “poverty” campaign, and privacy is rarely granted to those who jump into the spotlight. He trashes free enterprise in the name of the poor all be it with the weekly $400 haircut.

I would like to point out that he has described to us the radical liberal mindset. In his exclusive interview, he said, "becoming a national public figure, all of which fed a self-focus, an egotism, a narcissism”. The same can be seen in behaviors exhibited by many other individuals also involved in Obama’s campaign. From Howard Deans "scream", to Algores rants, Hitlary when she gets defensive. With any person running for political office those they associate with Wright, Phlager, Ayers in the case of Obama. You can tell a lot about a man by looking in his trash. John Edwards has admitted too much of what he previously denied because as he said,…“you can do whatever you want, you're invincible and there will be no consequences.” Obama flaunts this aspect of his campaign, just as Hillary did before she could not lose. Edwards is only admitting to the aspects of his affair that are proven fact.

In his own words Edwards described the side effects of environ-mental illness(EMI). Where by his own admission you, "feel invulnerable, that they feel it has gone on all of the time, that I'm not going to be scrutinized at this level ... and it will stay private.” The they are the Nancy Pelosi's (D) who campaign on lowering gas price when the national average was $2.29 a gallon. The same Speaker of the House, who ran out of town, turned out the lights and had police remove CSPAN. The they is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D) who has done everything he can to block any kind of an energy policy debate, let alone allow a vote. Instead, the they tell fellow Democrats in tight races to express support for lifting the federal ban on off shore drilling. The they do not intend to allow a vote on it.

They are protected in a media bubble that breaks a 2-year-old story right as Obama limps into the convention. Edwards has been made a martyr because the Dali-Bama is most high. Therefore, as Edwards goes he says, "My lord and my wife have forgiven me, so I'm going to move on." He embraces his religious side in an almost "uncle" like fashion, as a prize fighter bound for submission with one hand free to slap the mat and tap out.

Obama’s campaign has gone so bad his numbers only quit dropping as the story broke and his vacation started. MSM is not worried that the Dali-Bama or the democrats in congress are making giant sized carbon footprint on their 5 weeks of vacation. But there is a slight undertone in the base of the DNC, buyer’s remorse in their selections of the Dali-Bama and of the current leadership in congress. Hitlary still seems poised to jump back in at a moments notice unless she implodes under sniper fire. Edwards like Clinton has lied in a the same way. No matter how it starts out, the person becomes highly agitated as she/he denies facts that they have been confronted with. Symptoms of the illness appear similar in both cases. Many Americans believe the types of actions Gore takes mirror those of Edwards, Kennedy and Clinton.

One must really look at those surround the ones we elect to office. Barrack Obama is not only surrounded by the likes of Gore, Clinton, and Edwards but also the lock step MSM. An MSM media that provides the cover for one side of the isle in its relentless pursuit of the other. All of which are evidenced in the timing of a stories release and how hard the MSM has worked to promote any positive aspect they can unearth to spin attention away from the truth.


 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let the punishment fit the crime!!!

This story is about the gang that the liberals are trying to protect from the death penalty.  This details one of the most violent attacks one could imagine on two young girls 14 and 16 as they walked home late at night.  One of their killers was executed yesterday after bragging about his acts to friends, a trial by jury, and after an excess of appeals.  The last of which was filed by his American counsel in defense of their client Jose Medellin, that because of his citizenship he was unfairly denied his rights to speak with the Mexican counsulate at the time of his arrest. 
 
If you do not believe there should be a penalty that exstingushes the life of a rapist or a murderer you may need to to read the text link at the bottom of this page.  I can't imagine anyone but God capable of forgiving some thing like this.  But the news media went all out trying to as example the local news media clip.
 
The type of sub-human whose acts are detailed below is treated by the media as being a victim, hey say he is convicted, yes but in the end their sympathy for his rights.  At the end of the clip they conceided what amouts to a one liner about his victims and their families.  This is how much CBS, ABC, or NBC would treat you if it was your child God forbid.  Remeber they are the same who advocate partial birth abortion, and are against parential notification.
 
I thank God he gave us the technology he has given us to humanly execute Jose Medellin and other who commit such act.  I thank God we as a society don't leave it to fathers like the one in this story the injustice of fostering these animals. 
 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Declaring War on the Environmetally Ill

Declaring War on the Environmentally Ill

Who really cares if we are in a recession or not?  If we are one thing is for sure and that is we are here because of falling for it again.  Like the Yeti and Bigfoot the myths of the "Carbon Footprint" are fantasies of the ignorant.  Through pure propaganda they have long been waging this war against our economic structure.  Their goals are to rid earth of man, because at the core of their being they are the necessary evil.  Make no mistake they believe that the only reason for their own existence is to decrease the populations of mankind.  From Algore speaking of a womans "reproductive rights" as evironmentally "friendly".  To the very idea that the earth was flat "scientist" and those in government have throughout time have sought to control the minds of the masses through fear.  Just as Columbus discovered America so to shall we prove the hoaxs of the modern age.  But at what cost?  How much are you willing to pay at the pump, at the grocery, or to heat and cool your home? Did you just get a huge raise in pay?  Me neither and now we are told to recycle this and conserve that, drive these rolling mini death trap automobiles.  Sheople wake up you are being duped into this lunacy and their is not new world to seek refuge in.  We are pissing away what generations past worked so hard to achieve and died for.  Does it really make you feel better to buy Chinese goods.  They poisoned our pets and now they are making food for human consumtion.  Why is this?  Becasue in the name of environmental regulations most American companies that used to produce products made by American workers can't make a profit.  Out of sight out of your mind and the truest measure of ignorance you will find.  China and Mexico are doing the jobs Americans used to do but can't unless the want to leave this country.  
 
This is my solution boycott this entire culture of doom.  You can call me anti anything you want but until the solutions are vetted through actual science which relies on pure 100% fact I am done.  I will not recycle anything including used motor oil, plastic, and paper.  I will only purchase products like styrofoam because I want to enhance the temperature of my beverage.  When these product are of no further use I will burn them.  I drive a V8 F250 pickup and I love my A/C and will run it with the windows down so as to keep the fresh air coming into the cab of my truck.  When my child comes home from school with something from the environmetally ill I will teach her the truth of their missions as previously described.   This is a war my friends and unless you have the onions to stand up you will be tilled under by those who care more about dogs and cats than human beings.  Further their are only two distinct types of people in this world those who believe that GOD is all powerful.  That he created the earth and all things there in he being the only one who controls the temperature and blesses with his resouces and technologies.  Then there are those who will believe whatever they are told because they believe in the power of man.  The choice is yours but you can't straddle this fence.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOP missing the point on Middle Class Taxes

You can not say in today's market that you believe in a "free Market" economy, when at the same time you can not see the damage done to middle class wages and lifestyle by illegal immagration.  They speak of the top 10-20% of wage earners and the percentages of the taxes they pay.  These wage earners are also invested in the businesses that benefit from artificially cheap (slave) labor practices.  These practices are also responsible for the continuing efforts of democrat leaders to rasie the minimum wage.  Also proof that looking at unemployment numbers as a gauge of job growth is a dated source that neglects the millions of workers who have been forced into business to market their trade just to make the ends meet.
 
There are those in this party who beleive we need to open up our markets to free trade all over the world.  I happen to be one of those who sees the benefits America has set in the world free market economy.  However, I also believe in leading by way of example.  Free trade is not a one way street.  We trade our items in their market and theirs are traded here free of tariffs, surcharges, and additional taxation.
 
The fact that the same proponents to these trade agreements also want to inject a guest worker program into a middle class work environment beleaugered by the ill effects of illegal immagration.  When will we expect our leaders to hold corporate enterprise to follow the laws that are on the books in this country.  Simply going after the illegal workers is not enough, we need to arrest and imprision corporate CEO's, seize shareholders dividends, and if necessesary remove the comapnies from the public market place.  The time for action is at hand if we want to get a majority of the American people on board this free market ideal we need to start by allowing a true free market exist in the middle class of our own nation. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

George W Bush Resignation letter you may need to read this!!!

Note to readers I didn't write this but I wish I had the authours name is at the end of the page I posted it because it is brilliant and I hope it sinks in I am in the 28% always have been the rest of you loosers could get alot out of this but your brain is AWOL!!!


If Bush resigned today, this is what his speech would be.....





Normally, I start these things out by saying 'My Fellow Americans', not doing it this time.  If the polls are any indication, I don't know who more than half of you are anymore.  I do know something terrible has happened, and that you're really not fellow Americans any longer.

I'll cut right to the chase here: I quit.  Now before anyone gets all in lather about me quitting to avoid impeachment, or to avoid prosecution, let me assure you: There's been no breaking of laws or impeachable offenses in this office.




The reason I'm quitting is simple. I'm fed up with you people. I'm fed up because you have no understanding of what's really going on in the world, or what's going on in this once-great nation of ours.  And the majority of you are too damned lazy to do your homework and figure it out.

Let's start local. You've been sold a bill of goods by politicians and the news media.  Polls show that the majority of you think the economy is in the tank. And that's despite record numbers of homeowners, including record numbers of MINORITY homeowners.  And while we're mentioning minorities, I'll point out that minority business ownership is at an all-time high.  Our unemployment rate is as low as it ever was during the Clinton administration.  I've mentioned all those things before, but it doesn't sink in.





Despite the shock to our economy of 9/11, the stock market has rebounded to record levels and more Americans than ever are participating in these markets.  We face real threats in the world.  Meanwhile, all you can do is whine about gas prices, and most of you are too damn stupid to realize that gas prices are high because there's increased demand in other parts of the world, and because a small handful of noisy idiots are more worried about polar bears and beachfront property than your economic security.

Don
't give me this 'blood for oil' crap.  If I were trading blood for oil I would've already seized Iraq's oil fields and let the rest of the country go to hell.  And don't give me this 'Bush Lied; People Died' crap either.  If I were the liar you morons take me for, I could've easily had chemical weapons planted in Iraq so they could be 'discovered.'  Instead, I owned up to the fact that the intelligence was faulty.





Let me remind you that the rest of the world thought Saddam had the goods, same as me.  Let me also remind you that regime change in Iraq was official US policy before I came into office.   Clinton established that policy.  Bet you didn't know that, did you?

You idiots need to understand that we face a unique enemy. Back during the cold war, there were two major competing political and economic models squaring off. We won that war, but we did so because fundamentally, the Communists wanted to survive, just as we do.  We were simply able to out spend and out-tech them.





That's not the case this time.  The soldiers of our new enemy don't care if they survive  In fact, they want to die.  That'd be fine, as long as they weren't also committed to taking as many of you with them as they can.  But they are.  They want to kill you, and the bastards are all over the globe. You should be grateful that they haven't gotten any more of us here in the   United States since September 11.  But you're not.  That's because you've got no idea how hard a small number of intelligence, military, law enforcement, and homeland security people have worked to make sure of that.  When this whole mess started, I warned you that this would be a long and difficult fight.  I'm disappointed how many of you people think a long and difficult fight amounts to a single season of ' Survivor.'




Instead, you've grown impatient.  You're incapable of seeing things through the long lens of history, the way our enemies do.  You think that wars should last a few months, a few years, tops.

Making matters worse, you actively support those who help the enemy.  Every time you buy the New York Times, every time you send a donation to a cut-and-run Democrat's political campaign, well, you might just as well FedEx a grenade launcher to a Jihadist.  It amounts to the same thing.




In this day and age, it's easy enough to find the truth. It's all over the Internet; it just isn't on the pages of the New York Times or on NBC News  But even if it were, I doubt you'd be any smarter. Most of you would rather watch American Idol.

I could say more about your expectations that the government will always be there to bail you out, even if you're too stupid to leave a city that's below sea level and has a Cat 5 hurricane approaching.



I could say more about your idiotic belief that government, not your own wallet, is where the money comes from.  But I've come to the conclusion that were I to do so, it would sail right over your heads.

So, I quit.  I'm going back to Crawford.  I've got an energy-efficient house down there (Al Gore could only dream of) and the capability to be fully self-sufficient.  No one ever heard of Crawford before I got elected, and as soon as I'm done here pretty much no one will ever hear of it again.  Maybe I'll be lucky enough to die of old age before the last pillars of America fall.



Oh, and by the way, Cheney's quitting too.

That means Pelosi is your new President.  You asked for it - you can have her.  Watch what she does carefully, because I still have a glimmer of hope that there are just enough of you remaining who are smart enough to turn this thing around in 2008.

So that's it.  God bless what's left of America.  Some of you know what I mean.  The rest of you - kiss my a--!
 
John W. Unkart
Author of Offshore Pursuit
8106 Libertytown Road
Berlin, MD 21811

410-641-4565
unkartlanding@aolcom
offshorepursuit@aol.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part 4 Q & A Topic the world issues

This is part 4 of my no holds barred interview with Missouri's 5th US House District Primary candidate Chris Knowlton.
 
 
 

World Issues

1) Would you support the President of the United States if he felt it in our nations best interest to bomb or send air strikes to eliminate a nuclear threat in Iran? What about Israel if they attack? What about a response to attacks on Israel?

I thought the E.U. was going to handle Iran… Once again America has to carry the worlds load. If there were no other option I would whole heartadly support Israel or the U.S. in eradicating the threat of Iran with Nukes. I pray that the population of Iran will take it upon themselves to overthrow the Hitler of our age and join the nuke free world. It is a long shot, but I believe that the Persians have a desire to be free and out from under the thugs that seem to be ruling their country. Let’s pray that they save us from taking extreme action!

 2) Do you believe that free trade with Columbia is good for the American worker or the government? Or both, if so how?


 We need allys in the war on drugs and this current leader of Columbia seems to be doing the right things at great personal risk. He and his country should be rewarded and to the degree the Free Trade act would help his cause, I would be for the Columbia act. Our workers are under threat by other more menacing forces and that includes China and the job killing restrictions that our government has imposed on industry. But I feel that Columbia is not a direct threat to our workers.
 
3) Would you support capital punishment for Osama Bin Laden if he is captured? Should he be tried in America, by a tribunal, or by the UN?

A quick hanging would be best. But who should be trusted to make that happen? Show trials and the rhetoric that would be spewed would be distasteful whereever he was on trial.

4) Would you favor normalizing relations with Cuba?
 
Not while Castro is in power. Even the brother is a tyrant and can not ever be trusted
 
5)If legislation requiring all Chinese products imported to the US be on a probationary scrutiny until safety concerns are eliminated would you sign on to it?
 
Yes! But there are underling fundamentals that need to be addressed. I am for imposing duties on all imports, which would equal the cost of production in America. Then we can have a true discussion on the restrictive nature of the regulations and taxes, which burden American businessmen and their decisions to import goods. Where is this fairness that is often spoken of when it comes to American jobs? Let’s have that discussion and see what we find. What former government person is an agent for foreign concerns?
 
6) Given the fact that Democrat leaders are invested in a failed war strategy, is it now time to call them out on the successes of the Presidents surge plan?
 
Some one should! The lies, deception, the crazy political posturing that has been the template of this past 8 years is amazing. Yes the Dems. Should be held to account for their words, Jack Mirtha. Some should be ask to resign for their cruel and lazy view of what they originally voted for.
 
 
Hope this offers some insight into Mr Knowlton and how he would conduct business as Missouri's 5th District House Rep.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Redefining 1st Ammendment DNC "Freedom Cage"

Now I thought I had heard it all from the mouths of unaccountable democrats but this really takes the cake.  So now the people who we have allowed to redefine speech and the entire 1st ammendment have come up with the most oxymoronic phrase I have ever heard of.  These are the same genitless clowns who say a soldiers funeral has a right to be protested by stinky hippies.  The same animals who think a "dipiction" of so called art should be publically displayed that is anti-Christ.  Yet there is no place for school prayer, eventhough that is exactly the protection gauranteed by the 1st Ammendment.  The same who have removed every religious symbol from public view.  I have a prediction to make that with in my life they will try to pass laws requiring churches to keep their religious symbols behind closed doors becasue they find it offensive.
 
But non the less read this link
http://www.examiner.com/a-1511795~Recreate_68_will_protest_DNC_s__freedom_cage_.html
 
The protesters at this years Denver DNC convention are being asked to protest in what democrats call "the freedom cage".  This 5,000 square foot cage is being erected 500yds from the site of festivities to give the sheeple who want to protest Hillary Clintons lose in the primary.  Oh and you get frisked going in, so you no longer have the right ro assemble in this country if it is in protest of the ruling class of democrats either, just another double standard in the wake of the DNC (Denver's Nazi Convention)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Scoop this: DNC still gets their gas tax free for convention

Like all the other DNC double standards and slight of hand politics, this gas story has more legs then a John Madden turkey.  First off the DNC has to date not only gotten tax free gas since the host commitee began it's opperations in Denver they say in March (probably well before that).  But the DNC owes the bill for the gas they have consumed ($10,000) still to the city aside from the taxes.  Obama who is sure we wouldn't benefit from a gas tax holiday won't even comment on this latest gaff.  Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper (D) came out immediatly and accused RNC host commitee members of having similar arraignments with their host city.  Really, you mean the MSM monkeys missed that?  Oh thats right, probably because it never happened, but in true political fashion he deflects critism by pointing his finger away from what is proven fact to his hipothetical belief.  DNC spokemen excuse their actions by stating that private fuel souces might be tainted.  Could it be he is referring to Ethanol some reports have indicated that city pumps are not only exempt from state and federal taxes but also from the 10% Ethanol mandate.  There has got to be a picture of Harry Reid next hipocrit in the dictonary.  The other claim made by DNC officals is a need for security.  They claim cars carrying dignataries might be vulnerable if they don't get use of the city pumps. 
 
They still get their free cars washes, the City of Denver is still providing them with free buses and GM has offered them use of hybrid vehicles.  I thought there were campaign finance laws, not for democrats.
 
Oh and an inside source has also told me that the phrase "tax free gasoline" is deliberate in the sense that the DNC host commitee is still allowed tax free status on E85 since all of their vehicles are flex fuel they will still find a way around this yet.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
However sources in Denver 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Democrats have botched 08' & why they will loose in a landslide

Change is what Americans want, right?  Just what type change is a bit hidden in the meaning of the Obama watch.  He says change, he states we need hope, however the issues he champions are not the changes intelligent Americans want or need.   The housing crisis is a direct result of democrat legislation requiring lending and creating lending institutions to write loans to consumers with poor credit.  The prices on gas, groceries, and merchandise is a result of a scam about a silent victim call "the environment". 
 
Now how these problems are being "fixed" which will actually make them worse in the long run, because the same core issues still exist.  They affect the same group of people the "poor" and the middle class.  Both of which are at the core of the democrat base.  These are described as victims, unable to better themselves and in need of goverment intervention.  These people can't afford gasoline for their vehicles or even vehicles to drive in some cases.  They are seen as displaced when their homes go into foreclosure, and it doesn't matter if they work three jobs and never see their children they can't make it without big brother.
 
So if you really believe that do you think they will be able to afford a trip to the polls to vote?  As the media props up the democrats running those who can't get ahead may just believe they are the are the only ones with a chance.  That could mean some who have no sense of self responsibility may sit out the election.  Why? Because the candidate that would care about their "needs" is going to win even without their vote.  So why waste the gas if they had it.
 
But when it comes to the intelligent among those two demographics most will sacrifice to whatever end to excercise their voting power.  As they come more to know the democrat party they will speak out to their neighbor.  Since the neighbor can't defend the democrat position they will not want to deal with election facts and may tune out the entire process.
 
                          
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who is Barrack Huesein Obama

Read this I found it on a web site.  Is Barrack really a Muslim???????
 
 
 

Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya, his father's family was mainly Arabs. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro).

What does this mean? Maybe nothing. But, why is Obama trying to hide this? Why does he try to hide is middle name? Why does he try to hide the religious Muslim school he attented as a child in Indonesia? Why doesn't he set the record straight that he wouldn't be the first black President? Why so many cover-ups and hiding of the truth?

Further, at only 6.25% African Negro, would he even be the first President who was part black? Not at all! Our 3rd President, Thomas Jefferson was our first part black President. And he's not alone, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge were also part black.

President Andrew Jackson was the son of an Irish woman who married a black man. Andrew Jackson was such a high percentage black that his oldest brother was sold as a slave!

President Abraham Lincoln was the illegitimate son of an African man, he had very dark skin and coarse hair and his mother also allegedly came from an Ethiopian tribe. His heritage fueled so much controversy that Lincoln was nicknamed 'Abraham Africanus the First' by his opponents.

President Warren Harding never even denied claims that he was black, because he had black ancestors between both sets of parents and he attended Iberia College, a school founded to educate fugitive slaves.

President Calvin Coolidge was proud of his heritage and claimed his mother was dark because of mixed Indian ancestry. Coolidge's mother's maiden name was 'Moor' and in Europe the name 'Moor' was given to all blacks just as 'Negro' was used in America.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nebraskans are ignorant that's all I can figure

Every single time I hear Chuck Hagel the so-called Republican Senator from Nebraska speak I wonder how he keeps getting elected.  All I can figure is that there is something foul in the water or the breed stock is light or interwoven.  There is no excuse for his lack of party loyalty.  Offering his service to Obama to boost his credibility is a matter he is so ignorant on to help his fraudulent campaign is proof that this man cares little about his country and more for his own individual popularity.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When I grow up I want to be Obama

This whole overseas trip Obamessiah is taking is an absolute joke.  This punk attorney is trying to rewrite Bush foreign policy at the same time he is trying to take credit for a war effort he opposed and tried everything short of if not treasoness to sabotage.  This is not the only thing going on in the world right now either.  PanicRats are desperatly trying to under cut all efforts to have a floor vote on emegency energy reform.  The reason we are paying out the nose for everything from grocerys to gas is because they think a depressed economic picture is the only way they can get back in the white house.  That may have been true on merit but the bread crumbs of a shrinking dollar and engery dependence lead right to their door step.  It doesn't take an eighth grade education to see that they desperatly want us to lose in Iraq, legalize a slave class of workers to force lower and middle income workers onto welfare, and to top in off they want to us hate America.
 
If we just passed a law that excluded any and all attorneys from service in public office or made it a capital crime for an attorney to lie in the commision of the job they undertake whether it be private practice or public service we would go a long way in solving the problem areas in this government.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Corrected part 3 Q & A the Immigration???

This is part three of my five part interview with GOP primary candidate for Missouri's 5th US House District race Chris Knowlton.  I made an error and missed publishing a few of his answers and felt it best to republish the entire segment.  This is a vital national issue that effects everyone.  I think anyone who dares run to represent the views of his/her constituents should be asked and should answer each and every one of these questions.
 
I would like to thank Mr. Knowlton for his direct and honest answers to these tough questions.  I would also like to point out that I have invited his opponents to also give us their opinions on this issue.   I sent them a complete copy of the interview below and have yet to hear back from their campaign offices.  If they respond I will post it as I have with Mr Knowlton's and will follow it up with a question by question breakdown on the differences on the issues.
 
 
 

Immigration

1a) Are you in favor of making American English the official language of the United States of America? Yes

English is the common language and our historical tongue and if there has to be a law to establish what is true. I will stand and make it so. The question is how stupid do we have to be to need a law to state the truth? Shakespeare lawyer rant may have been true then but is even truer now.

1b) Is it now time to stop the practice of teaching core curriculum public school classes in foreign languages? Yes

1c) Do you consider Mexican Spanish a foreign language when it is used as a primary means of communication in the US? Yes

2a) Would you be in favor of returning ALL criminals to their home countries who are in the US illegally and criminals with temporary status.

With 35% of our Federal prisons being filled by other than Citizens I would consider the immediate deportation of all criminals. My problem is that I do not trust their countries of origin to make their sentences stick. There would be all kinds of revolving doors and corruption that would put them back on the streets of the U.S. ! In principal I agree they should have never been here in the first place.

I don’t think it is in our countries best interest to allow criminals to benefit from our countries blessings. If they have bad backgrounds in their home country, they should be returned. If they are convicted of wrong doing in the States they should serve their full sentence and be deported without any ability to achieve freedom in our country.

2b) As it concerns the 14th amendment ,children born to illegal aliens. This seems to be a tough issue to because it deals with innocent children. Would you consider reforming laws that more clearly define the exceptions to the 14th amendment to include children born to guest workers, criminals and all those who refuse to get in line for a green card? Or does the 14th amendment already make it clear in Sec. 2 that "other crime" could constitute an exception for all who have violated our immigration laws?

It is a common practice in the law to seize the proceeds of unlawful acts and I can see that working in this situation. If someone was born here of one or more illegals after the 1987 Amnesty, there should be special consequences. What those are I am not quite sure, but if there are no consequences we will never put a stop to this invasion. As United States’ citizens we must allow ourselves the thought of placing a value on our Legal Birth-Right.

2c) Would you be in favor of zero tolerance as it relates to enforcement?

Without question, zero tolerance should be the standard in dealing with Illegal Immigration. If their family arrived after the 1987 Simpson-Mazzolli bill there should be a special court for immediate review with deportation as the goal.

 

3a) A lower end income taxpayer has to perform a trade for less to compete with an illegal worker alien (IWA). Do you believe that denies the poor and middle class workers in America the right to work in a free market economy.

I have seen a lot of good hard working Americans being driven out of one trade or another. Tile, drywall, roofing, concrete and many other trades have been affected by the 20 million illegals that we support. No one will ever know what individuals would have done had this cheap labor not been available. What businesses would still be employing citizens for a good wage? What businessmen would have been created with a more elastic wage base? We are a good and gracious nation. But at sometime even America will say that our laws mean something to us, even if you ignore them.

There is no question that the Millions of low-end Illegal workers depress the market value of many millions of legal citizens. How many entepnures have been forced out of their business plan and middle class future because they can not or will not compete with these Illegally low wages and quality of work? The Courts and the Feds have let the public down over the years in many ways. This blind eye towards the Illegal invasion and occupation, may be the worst case of Treason that our country has ever seen. It must be corrected for our children and grand children.

3b)Do you think the illegal aliens or the those who hire them want that to stop?

There is no indication that I have seen that there is any reason to stop. At this time there is no downside to the fraud and corruption that illegals or their boss must commit. If the goal is to utilize cheap and many times a substandard labor source, that’s where Illegals come in. No one can convince me that they are not aware of the status of those they employee. So they are complicit in the federal crime of identity theft at a minimum and in certain cases much worse criminal activity. If the current laws were enforced the jobs would dry up and many would self-deport.

 

4a) Should the US government provide guest worker programs to companies who feel they have a right to have labor at a specified rate of pay?

No. Setting wages is already handled in the Minimum Wage issue. If they are here the law says they are entitled to a minimum wage. To negotiate as a nation for lower than that would smack of hypocrisy. I can understand that Agri-Business and others would like lower input costs for their bottom-line. But isn’t that how some justify the current open borders philosophy? And there are Guest worker programs on the books. They may need to be streamlined for our current worker needs, but I ask who was doing the jobs before the Illegals? I bet they were Americans!

There are guest worker programs that are currently available. Surprise! It is just too much headache working with the Government and so easy to avoid detection that many go around the law. Thus, the Government is making criminals out of citizens by not enforcing certain laws and choosing to enforce others. What a great system.

 

 

4b) As it relates to guest workers isn’t any measure to make retroactive immigration reform just a scheme of price fixing the labor market?

Could be. But I feel that there may be a more sinister goal for retroactive immigration. There seems to be a party that needs a victim to prey on. This is not just the greedy corporate types, but a political movement that is running out of under-classed, under-educated needy people. Who can be lied to over the next few decades in the hopes of the Federal government giving them everything that they need. (I am not in that party!)

4c) What possible benefit can a guest worker program have on the "poor" and the middle class of this country?

I do not see and upside for the poor and middle class. Perhaps, the cost of certain items would be more affordable. But other than that, I can only see those coming in on guest worker programs, lowering the wages and opportunities for the rest of us.

5a) Should states most affected by illegal human labor smuggling be permitted to sue the federal government and be allowed to enforce current written law?

If a class action suit would get the House and Senate to take action I would apply! Since they are lawyers in most cases that may be the only way to get their attention. Tie up their personal and Electoral assets until the suit is complete. But, we should not leave out the Judges that overstep the constitutional truths that we find self-evident. Those who allow Illegals go away after an initial hearing on their status. Especially when that Illegal causes trouble or does a DWI T-bone into a family of four! That judge should be off the bench!

5b) Does lack of immigration enforcement weaken other law enforcement efforts concerning drugs, gangs, and other crimes of violence?

Duh! How do you think the first time crossing gets paid for? Bicycles loaded with drugs are pushed to the border and left at the staging area just inside our territory. A $20,000 fee per person must be paid some way. And drugs are an easy profitable, high demand product that pay off most of the coyotes who encourage those new comers to keep up the business! Where there are drugs there is cash and guns which can sometimes go off. That could be why there are 35% of the federal prison population filled illegals.

6a) Do you think a worker in a hazardous work zone is in danger or possibly a danger to others around him/her if that person is unable to communicate in English?

Yes.

6b) Wouldn’t a law banning hiring practices by all enterprises that require bilingual or other foreign language background better protect the rights of the American worker?

They can not enforce a ban the importation of stuff that is Illegal. So how can they make a hiring ban work? The best way to get through our current mess is to agree as a nation that we speak English. Learn it or leave. If employers need international language skills as a requirement for job status, I have no problem. So long as it is not McDonalds or Joe’s roofing.

7a) Can we solve the problems of health care and education without addressing the issue of illegal immigration.

No.

 

8a) Do you support a southern border fence as passed by the 109th congress?

Yes and would fully fund this effort and deploy 1,000,000 bureaucrats to monitor the border. This would serve two distinct purposed. First to get them out of Washington and secondly to prevent the Envasion from the south being continued.

Yes! It took less time to build the A-bomb than to build this fence. How far have we slipped?

 

8b) Do you support using legislation to encourage illegal aliens to return to their own countries voluntarily?

In a coercive way! Drying up Identification fraud, duplicate SSN usage, following these duplicate numbers that are registered with the IRS and all of the S.S.N. 000-00-0000 numbers that are used would be a start. But without teeth, the current situation will continue to grow this extractable problem. Our full nation must be of one accord that Citizenship means something and has extrinsic value! Something worth fighting for and standing up for! With out that feeling in our nation we will fall for the emotional stories of the families that are split apart by our mean laws. What about the families that were left behind when the Illegals headed this way? Will the media dig that deeply?

 

8c) Is there ever a time or place you would consider endorsing a $250 billion plan to mass deport all person in the US illegally?

Not likely. Our system will have to work on the employers first, then the sanctuary cities or states and then perhaps the last 10 million will have to be rounded up through charitable agencies if the rest of the social service safety net is removed. That is unless they become more lawless and get caught! Then the courts and the jails will have to deal with them.

8d) What if we were attacked by a terrorist who came over our southern border? Or if the terrorist is an illegal alien?

I would hate to see any further attacks on our country such as 9-11. But the likelihood of the U.S. avoiding future aggression by those who envy or hate us is small! We will be the target of many. Where it comes from will determine the response that the public will demand. I hesitate to predict anything. But I feel that we could get more serious if there was more of a perceived threat. 20 Million Illegals is cause enough for me, how about you?

9) Do you believe current illegal aliens want citizenship or do they just want things to stay the same?

That is an unknown. I believe that most illegals want a better life than what they have had in the past. They find this an easy place to stay and make good lives. This is the story of America. What we need to do is send them home to a better economy in their homeland. I believe that Americans would stand up and adopt to mentor honest hard working illegals, to help them get re-established in their home country. It is worth a shot. I can not see the U.S. with jackboots and guns rounding people up to deport. Yet it may come to that some day.

This is not their home. The major problem is that they can not make a living wage in their land. But they would be glad to be home if they could.

 

Chris Knowlton

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »